Spook

Escuadron 701 de Colombia esta admitiendo personal para organizar el Ala del Avión DCS A-10C. Inscripciones abiertas todos los meses. Nuestro horario es GMT-5 de Bogotá. http://www.escuadron701.com.co

This is the next DCS simulator, to say nothing more.

Excuse the question, as it exits the boxed version of DCS A-10C?

Already there is news of the new DCS?

For now then wait.

Tanks my friends.

For that, I ask that when it comes out the box version of DCS A-10C, I want the original version on DVD. That date has been specified by the output of the boxed version of the simulator?

Question: Have you already decided, for some of the aircraft for which we voted?

What about when they make a beta version of this map?

Al fin una traducción decente gracias compañeros...

Could you please tell me if this is true?:

Guys, I am not very clear, in a Spanish website are announcing the start of the project DCS F-15E, I mean that despite the polls and all this thread, do not take into account? This is the website: http://www.escuadron69.net/v20/

Vibora te agradeceriamos si investigas con los jefe de ED y que vean la posibilidad de poner esa vista....no creen....?

I do not find funny, and less at this point where that ED should take a decision and start working on that topic.

I understand that there is already a poll on the subject, but what I wonder is, that decision was made that the aircraft is below .... The survey is simply have a point of view of people, but not the final decision of Eagle Dynamics.

Tanks.

The question that many of us do: what is the next aircraft DCS? The question that many of us do: what is the next aircraft DCS? All we saw the magnificent work that made Eagle Dynamics, but like everything, we want more, ask why, over the work of manufacturing, publishing, and customer delivery of A10C, which comes next?

Pues esa es la pregunta, veo que en los foros rusos y de ingles casi que revientan las discusiones sobre los simuladores de ED, mientras aquí habrá una por semana y eso..... Bueno pues busquemos una solución y si es necesario yo posteare más temas y a ver si movemos un poco más el foro en español. Por otra partea Design gracias, como ves ya me sirve el foro...:megalol:

I was told that if it was with the final version of the DCS A-10C. That was not compatible with another simulator for now. I already opened a discussion by asking something like that.

Diablo: You're absolutely right, people often waste time and money on a game that developed in less than a week, which certainly leaves nothing to knowledge, only to kill and now. See that is one of the struggles that most book in my country, here people prefer to pirate a game to play and then forget, but when I make them realize that a flight simulator lets a range of expertise, many are upset that believe that they criticize the way they act, I think that ignorant. But when I see a finished product as well as the DCS BS or the A-10C that although this in beta, it shows the interest of a company listening to its users, the fact that take out a beta version for people to try and then take some criticism, to help improve the simulator, I think is a plus for ED. I think that if I pay more for a product of this quality, so then take out another series DCS, which is what we all hope, I'd pay a little more and says "Diablo." I hope I apologize for my English, but use a translator to participate in this forum.

I think now that the beta version is in the A-10C, and having on hand at both test drivers is a good opportunity to prove once and look for ways that the A10C, is compatible with LOMAC 2.0 .

Well, if the BS, but it is there where is the dilemma, if the BS if that is compatible with 2.0 LOMAC is not? LOMAC If the flight is compatible with the BS network, why not be with the DCS-10C?

Spanish as a forum for you I just found out that the A-10c Sim, not be networked with LOMAC 2.0 and BS, is something that saddens me, it was the opportunity to do joint operations and campaigns in aerial combat, I would like know if this is true, if it is because we have the right and looked for someone to a solution and to help the ED team to solve this connection, which in my view is the success of the DCS, the buy when it left the patch attachable to Lock ON 2.0. If not you then sorry to bother this thread and I just want to clarify that and stop it once and rumors and so have clear, that if someone in my country asks me about this subject as I can tell with certainty whether may or may not make a network connection in the entire series DCS. Wow, and I dream of flying come out, network versions of American planes on the stage of Nevada. Thanks guys, I hope clear answers and reactions to this issue.:cry:

* That extension will have on stage? * Cities or towns that we see? * Rivers and lakes that we see? * The stage will have a shooting range? * We will see people on stage? * Understand that there is near Area 51, this will be simulated in this scenario? * I know there are Red Flag, with the A10C is permitted to make such events, using this scenario? * I can edit missions I stage? * If the stage travels to the sea can naval missions? * We will have the opportunity to fly in the Grand Canyon? * We see the city of "Las Vegas" as is now taking off to the south west of the Nellis base? ... Me explain see hotels in the streets and parks of this city famous? * The scenario has improved or put option addons to give more details? * Other DCS simulation series also have the option to have this stage or is exclusive to American aircraft and helicopters in the future sell or DCS? * This scenario, and even the Black Sea provide navigational aids such as lights PAPI, airways, VOR, ADF and NDB?. In previous editions of Lock On and DCS were not taken into account. I personally have a set of PAPI lights approach is very important, it helps me to approach safely. So I wonder whether such aid is included in this scenario? Me are other questions but hope colleagues will help me to formulate them. Thank you.

Las Vegas Motor Speedway in the center. Nellis Air Force Base in the lower left corner.