Jump to content

Surely I can't be the only one...


OutOnTheOP

Recommended Posts

...who, after five or ten minutes figuring out controls on the Sabre, had an uncontrollable urge to load 'er up with GAR-8s and set up a tail chase against a FW190D9.

 

I couldn't help but cackle maniacally as the missile went right up his tail, ending the fight nigh-effortlessly for me. "Suck it, Hans! That's for all the grief when the AI FW190D9 first released, and took a zillion and a half rounds of .50!"

 

Ahhh, it feels good.

 

From what I've seen (so far), the F-86 is a dream of a module. The only issues I've had so far are generally related to my computer setup, which is very sub-optimal since I moved recently and haven't really put the computer back together right.

 

It does seem to ground loop a bit on the easy side, though. Landing was a piece of cake, but as soon as I touched the brakes, it was doing donuts off the runway. Might be a setup fault with my toe brake axes, I don't know.

 

*edit* I was impressed that the lock-on distance for the GAR-8s against the FW190 seemed so short... I think only 800 meters. I had previously tested them against the AN-30, and it seemed to get good tone against that from around 1.5km. Granted, I haven't done in-depth testing on it, just noticed it as I was toying around with the module, but if IR signature and radar signature are separately modeled, that's fantastic, and good on ya', Eagle Dynamics


Edited by OutOnTheOP
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Surely I can't be the only one...

 

Unfortunately, our new opponent (mig-15) seems to be quite a challenge though :( I did a dogfight last night with one, it may be that I'm not as good with energy management with the f-86, but I had my hands full.


Edited by JMasterFlash
wording error
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...