Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

So, I have been watching a bunch of Vietnam documentaries lately, and I have been wondering, is the difference between the F-8 Crusader and the A-7 Corsair the same as the difference between the MiG-23 and MiG-27?

 

one is A-A oriented and the other is A-G oriented respectively.

DCS: F-4E really needs to be a thing!!!!!!

 

 

Aircraft: A-10C, Ka-50, UH-1H, MiG-21, F-15C, Su-27, MiG-29, A-10A, Su-25, Su-25T, TF-51

Posted

While the A-7 was derived from/inspired by the F-8, there is little in common between them beyond basic appearance/layout and the company that designed and built them.

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

Posted

Ah, ok. Just me wondering how easy it would be to build an F-8 after an A-7 gets built.

DCS: F-4E really needs to be a thing!!!!!!

 

 

Aircraft: A-10C, Ka-50, UH-1H, MiG-21, F-15C, Su-27, MiG-29, A-10A, Su-25, Su-25T, TF-51

Posted

Different exterior 3d model, different cockpit, different engine, different radar/avionics, and different aerodynamics. I can't think of much if anything that could be carried over from one project to the other, except possibly licensing from current owner of the design.

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

Posted
While the A-7 was derived from/inspired by the F-8, there is little in common between them beyond basic appearance/layout and the company that designed and built them.

 

Think of the difference between a General Dynamics F-16 and a Mitsubishi F-2. They look similar, use the same aerodynamic principles and basic body shape... but you can't put repair parts from the F-16 in the F-2.

 

For that matter, the same is true of the F/A-18C and F/A-18E. Those are NOT the same aircraft. They just look similar. The E probably shouldn't even have been called an "F/A-18", but to the best of my knowledge, they did it because it was easier to get funding for an "upgrade" to an existing aircraft than for a whole new model.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...