Jump to content

TOR missile launch animation/missile flight path


Recommended Posts

Posted

The real way of ejection looks a lot nicer. Please create a simple animation of the missile

 

1. blowing out of the launcher (decelerating) till it is 5 meters above the Tor, then

2. thruster ignition (easiest would be a simple smoke effect near warhead)

3. missile ignition (or for easy modelling, just simply make the smoke effect only from 20 m altitude above Tor, meaning approx. 25 m above the ground... wink.gif )

 

 

 

So the code would just look sth. like those 3 major steps.

 

1: Boost missile with speed 15-20 m/s, decelerate (heavy gravity value? Missile weight 167 kg)

 

2: 300 milliseconds (0.3 sec) after boost/20 m above boost point/Tor, ignite thrusters [more smoke on opposite site of target heading (opposite heading)] and meanwhile missile aligns to intercept-point/-course (taking 0.3 - 0.4 seconds / 5 meters distance till 20 m above Boost point

 

3: 500 milliseconds (0.5 sec) after boost / 20/25 m above boost point, rocket motor ignition.

 

 

To give you an idea of how awesome the real launches of the awesome NBC (nuclear, biological and chemical)-protected cold-war-era SAM look, just check here (click on title in video to watch fullscreen):

 



 

 

 

Or this one, shows even slow motion:

 



DCS Wishlist: 2K11 Krug SA-4 Ganef SAM, VR-TrackIR icons next to player names in score-chart

PvP: 100+ manual player-kills with Stingers on a well known dynamic campaign server - 100+ VTOL FARP landings & 125+ hours AV-8B, F-14 crew, royal dutch airforce F-16C - PvP campaigns since 2013

DCS server-admins: please adhere to a common sense gaming industry policy as most server admins throughout the industry do. (After all there's enough hostility on the internet already which really doesn't help anyone. Thanks.)

Dell Visor VR headset, Ryzen 5 5600 (6C/12T), RTX 4060 - basic DCS-community rule-of-thumb: Don't believe bad things that a PvP pilot claims about another PvP pilot without having analyzed the existing evidence

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...