MiloMorai Posted September 21, 2016 Posted September 21, 2016 "However the only 'fact' Ullmann cites in support is rather nebulous; high ranking & highly decorated pilots invariably received the latest equipment in an effort to maintain an advantage over their adversaries- rather over-looking the fact that the K-4 was proposed as an up-dated fighter-bomber variant." http://falkeeins.blogspot.ca/search/label/Erich%20Hartmann
MAD-MM Posted September 21, 2016 Posted September 21, 2016 Updated from what? 109 was able since E4/B E7 to carry bombs. With bombs load out it was technically fighter bomber. The real specialized ground attack squadron (Schlachtgeschwader) use like in many other nations radial cooled Plane Fw-190 F/G because of his more reliable Engine to ground fire and with under wing racks it carry twice of the bombs of the 109. Would be make no sense at all. Once you have tasted Flight, you will forever walk the Earth with your Eyes turned Skyward. [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] 9./JG27
Friedrich-4B Posted September 22, 2016 Posted September 22, 2016 According to the JaPo book, the K series was originally designed to carry 30mm cannon in a standardised, aerodynamically refined airframe, while using the most powerful variants of the DB 605 that were either available or expected to be available. The K-4 was designed for the DB 605D series and came equipped as standard with the fuselage MW50/fuel tank, while many of its internal components were improved or re-positioned. When you think about it, the 109 was originally intended to be a light defense fighter armed with two rifle-calibre machine guns and powered by a c. 600 hp engine. That it was able to be continually updated and refined to be powered by an 1,800 - 1,975 hp engine, while being armed with an MK 108 and 2 MG 131s, plus all the other extra equipment, and still be a highly competitive fighter in 1945, shows just how well the basic airframe was designed in 1934. [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]************************************* Fortunately, Mk IX is slightly stable, anyway, the required stick travel is not high... but nothing extraordinary. Very pleasant to fly, very controllable, predictable and steady. We never refuse to correct something that was found outside ED if it is really proven...But we never will follow some "experts" who think that only they are the greatest aerodynamic guru with a secret knowledge. :smartass: WWII AIRCRAFT PERFORMANCE
Recommended Posts