Ala12Rv-watermanpc Posted September 28, 2017 Author Posted September 28, 2017 Ok, will do that, at least until some new question pops in my mind :P...thanks a lot!!:) Take a look at my MODS here
Ironhand Posted September 29, 2017 Posted September 29, 2017 Assuming that means using the "Y" key, it makes no difference. The "clamp" remains. Which makes sense, I guess, since it's not there to limit the AoA. It's the roll component that it's limiting. Perhaps to limit your ability to stall one wing significantly before the other and put yourself on your back? DK. BTW, never noticed it until this AM but the clamp is there in the -27, too. EDIT: I guess thinking of it as an AoA clamp is a misrepresentation. It's actually an AoA roll clamp. EDIT II: Now that I'm thinking about it, I bet you'd see the same clamping event even without direct control mode engaged as long as you push up to the 25° AoA mark. Didn't think to check that this morning. Just came back to add a note that this is, indeed, the case. Also surprised me that, in a poweroff stall with the FCS engaged, it's really hard to get the -33 to 25° without really working at it. YouTube Channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCU1...CR6IZ7crfdZxDg _____ Win 11 Pro x64, Asrock Z790 Steel Legend MoBo, Intel i7-13700K, MSI RKT 4070 Super 12GB, Corsair Dominator DDR5 RAM 32GB.
LJQCN101 Posted September 29, 2017 Posted September 29, 2017 Thanks for that. The reasoning makes sense and the travel range limit in the sim seems about right. Are you referring to the real world manual (if so, can you reference the page?) or did I just miss it in the DCS manual? Just 27SK RL manual but mine is Chinese version. BTW I tried carrier landing with Direct Control On, with ease. Static stability of the aircraft may be too high. Here's the track: Su33 3wire Direct Control.trk EFM / FCS developer, Deka Ironwork Simulations.
Ironhand Posted September 29, 2017 Posted September 29, 2017 Just 27SK RL manual but mine is Chinese version. BTW I tried carrier landing with Direct Control On, with ease. Static stability of the aircraft may be too high. That's embarrassing. Right there in the very first section, too. Although it sounds as if you can force your way past the restriction. I'll check out the trk at my earliest opportunity. My impression as well is that the -33 is less "flighty" than the -27 in direct control mode (in the sim). YouTube Channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCU1...CR6IZ7crfdZxDg _____ Win 11 Pro x64, Asrock Z790 Steel Legend MoBo, Intel i7-13700K, MSI RKT 4070 Super 12GB, Corsair Dominator DDR5 RAM 32GB.
Ala12Rv-watermanpc Posted September 29, 2017 Author Posted September 29, 2017 Just came back to add a note that this is, indeed, the case. Also surprised me that, in a poweroff stall with the FCS engaged, it's really hard to get the -33 to 25° without really working at it. That's embarrassing. Right there in the very first section, too. Although it sounds as if you can force your way past the restriction. I'll check out the trk at my earliest opportunity. My impression as well is that the -33 is less "flighty" than the -27 in direct control mode (in the sim). Yes, I also didn't test that properly but yeah, the clamp is also there when out of DCS. About the 33 being less "flighty", yes, I thought the same...expected a more maneuverable plane once DCS is enabled than the 27. Take a look at my MODS here
Recommended Posts