michelip Posted March 21, 2018 Posted March 21, 2018 Want to bomb from rooftop level without getting blown up? See my posts accidentally placed in DCS - Combined Arms - Bugs & Problems - Weapons - P51 Low Level Bombing work around. Apologies for the error. Regards, Mich
Zabuzard Posted March 21, 2018 Posted March 21, 2018 How about including the content here? Or at least link the thread. Also, why is it placed under "Bugs & Problems"? Is it a bug if you get blown up by shrapnel because you are flying too low? Don't think so.
michelip Posted March 22, 2018 Author Posted March 22, 2018 How about including the content here? Or at least link the thread. Also, why is it placed under "Bugs & Problems"? Is it a bug if you get blown up by shrapnel because you are flying too low? Don't think so. Hi Zabuza, It seems that my posting has caused you some irritation, and for that I apologise. In answer to your questions: 1. I thought that it would be sufficient to direct any interested person to the location of the post. I am an old bloke and not forum-literate. Tell me how to "link the thread"and I'll have a go at it. 2. I agree that it is not a bug, but the category is "Bugs and Problems" In my view the developers' failure to programme the option of fuse delay in an aircraft whose historical functions included low level strafing and bomb strikes is a problem. Kind regards, Mich.
Zabuzard Posted March 22, 2018 Posted March 22, 2018 (edited) I see. After some research using the search function I saw that this was already reported as feature request to ED and they already have it on their list. But as low priority. Meanwhile note that dive bombing and toss bombing works very well in the P-51D. Dive bombing was also the most common used technique, so I can totally understand why it's only low priority. Edited March 22, 2018 by Zabuza
Paradox Posted March 23, 2018 Posted March 23, 2018 The original post is here Thought I'd take the liberty of linking it on your behalf.
michelip Posted March 23, 2018 Author Posted March 23, 2018 The original post is here Thought I'd take the liberty of linking it on your behalf. Thanks Paradox - much appreciated. Regards, Mich.
Recommended Posts