S77th-konkussion Posted March 28, 2007 Posted March 28, 2007 http://www.thewest.com.au/default.aspx?MenuID=145&ContentID=24657 :shocking: If that had hit this plane there would have been rumors of a collision with ET- you just KNOW it. [sIGPIC]http://forums.eagle.ru/attachment.php?attachmentid=43337&d=1287169113[/sIGPIC]
nscode Posted March 28, 2007 Posted March 28, 2007 Did it have a datalink? :D Never forget that World War III was not Cold for most of us.
EscCtrl Posted March 28, 2007 Posted March 28, 2007 Amuses me when they say it was in close proximity at 'five nautical miles' - yes that is close in this situation as the chances of it being within that range are extremely low but in day-to-day terms that is still literally miles away :P
S77th-konkussion Posted March 28, 2007 Author Posted March 28, 2007 5 nautical miles is more than close when you're doing 400 nm per hour, hoss. :D [sIGPIC]http://forums.eagle.ru/attachment.php?attachmentid=43337&d=1287169113[/sIGPIC]
Romik Posted March 29, 2007 Posted March 29, 2007 weired... Russians report that the "progress" (name of the ship) left ISS Tuesday at 22:11 (+4UTC). And stated that the ship was in a five hour controlled descent. Which means it ended up in an uncontrolled fall Wednesday at around 03:00AM Moscow time... which is in NZ time(+12UTC), 11:00AM... "Airways New Zealand had been warned by Russian authorities almost two weeks ago that a satellite would be entering the earth's atmosphere sometime today between 10.30am and midday NZ time (6.30-8am WA time)." match! :-) Sometimes I love reporters... EDIT: ops.. my bad... Moscow's time is +4UTC, not 6... Athlon64 3500+; A8V-DX; 1Gig PC3200; Quadro4 980XGL; SCSI; Win2K3; MacBook Pro 17" X52 tweak: http://forum.lockon.ru/showthread.php?t=16972
Recommended Posts