FZG_Immel Posted June 10, 2018 Posted June 10, 2018 Yeah i know.. shouldnt do that without AWLS... but still fun. includes the whole setting up of the plane (radio/TCN,lights, cockpit etc), cat take off, approach, pattern and landing given the lack of AWLS i feel this is the safest method.. there is fog up to 1000ft limiting the forward visibility to short of 2nm under that altutude. Actually you can see you lose the carrier during most of the pattern. A bit low at the very end.. I guess I caught wire 1 or 2... perfectible! aF3BY1iniXk [sIGPIC]https://forums.eagle.ru/signaturepics/sigpic70550_3.gif[/sIGPIC] Asus Z390-H - SSD M.2 EVO 970 - Intel I9 @5.0ghz - 32gb DDR4 4000 - EVGA 3090 - Cougar FSSB + Virpil WRBRD + Hornet Stick - Thrustmaster TPR Pedal + WinWing MIP + Orion + TO and CO pannels - Track IR5
Kenan Posted June 10, 2018 Posted June 10, 2018 I assume any type of night vision (HUD, Goggles) is yet to be implemented in the sim? Trying a night landing in VR is very difficult (at least for me) without actual visual aids. [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] Commanding Officer of: 2nd Company 1st financial guard battalion "Mrcine" See our squads here and our . Croatian radio chat for DCS World
ttaylor0024 Posted June 10, 2018 Posted June 10, 2018 Night traps are case III, straight ins. Set tacan course to final course on the straight in (landing area angle, BRC -12* or so). I assume any type of night vision (HUD, Goggles) is yet to be implemented in the sim? Trying a night landing in VR is very difficult (at least for me) without actual visual aids. Correct, coming but not in yet. You don't use NVGs to land on the boat though.
FZG_Immel Posted June 10, 2018 Author Posted June 10, 2018 Night traps are case III, straight ins. Set tacan course to final course on the straight in (landing area angle, BRC -12* or so). Correct, coming but not in yet. You don't use NVGs to land on the boat though. in the absence of the AWLS, straight INs are absolutely not an advantage. especially with a 1.5nm visibility [sIGPIC]https://forums.eagle.ru/signaturepics/sigpic70550_3.gif[/sIGPIC] Asus Z390-H - SSD M.2 EVO 970 - Intel I9 @5.0ghz - 32gb DDR4 4000 - EVGA 3090 - Cougar FSSB + Virpil WRBRD + Hornet Stick - Thrustmaster TPR Pedal + WinWing MIP + Orion + TO and CO pannels - Track IR5
FZG_Immel Posted June 10, 2018 Author Posted June 10, 2018 just did the same mission with a air refuel before the straight IN landing. I confirm though. Without the AWLS the straight in is a bit harder. But obviously doable. [sIGPIC]https://forums.eagle.ru/signaturepics/sigpic70550_3.gif[/sIGPIC] Asus Z390-H - SSD M.2 EVO 970 - Intel I9 @5.0ghz - 32gb DDR4 4000 - EVGA 3090 - Cougar FSSB + Virpil WRBRD + Hornet Stick - Thrustmaster TPR Pedal + WinWing MIP + Orion + TO and CO pannels - Track IR5
ttaylor0024 Posted June 10, 2018 Posted June 10, 2018 in the absence of the AWLS, straight INs are absolutely not an advantage. especially with a 1.5nm visibility Well, it's how it's done IRL. There are case III tacan only approaches, and they work well to set you up with a center/slightly high ball. Doing the normal pattern at night trying to maintain sight of the carrier and not descend into the black hole is a good way to end up flying a submarine.
Recommended Posts