Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
I hope the R-27 family also could benefit for that.

So do I, but I reckon it depends on the availability of proper reliable information:

based on wind tunnel test data
Spoiler

Ryzen 7 9800X3D | 96GB G.Skill Ripjaws M5 Neo DDR5-6000 | Asus ProArt RTX 4080 Super | ASUS ROG Strix X870E-E GAMING | Samsung 990Pro 2TB + 990Pro 4TB NMVe | VR: Varjo Aero
VPC MT-50CM2 grip on VPForce Rhino with Z-curve extension | VPC CM3 throttle | VPC CP2 + 3 | FSSB R3L | VPC Rotor TCS Plus base with SharKa-50 grip | Everything mounted on Monstertech MFC-1 | VPC R1-Falcon pedals with damper | Pro Flight Trainer Puma

OpenXR | PD 1.0 | 100% render resolution | DCS graphics settings
Win11 Pro 24H2 - VBS/HAGS/Game Mode ON

 

Posted
So do I, but I reckon it depends on the availability of proper reliable information:

 

We know the R-27 missile family's shape, and wind tunnel test software has become pretty accurate nowadays.

On account of that, I think eventually there will be an update for all missiles currently implemented in DCS.

Posted

guidance logic is what screws you, not necessarily speed. launched from 1.4m and high the R-27ER achieves a really great range. problem is 1. chaff will decoy with 100% effectiveness, and 2. it will "follow your nose" so tiny jinks on your part will have it doing 100% fin deflection the whole way in while it bleeds off it's mach 5 energy achieving nothing of value.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...