Raven (Elysian Angel) Posted August 15, 2018 Posted August 15, 2018 I hope the R-27 family also could benefit for that. So do I, but I reckon it depends on the availability of proper reliable information: based on wind tunnel test data Spoiler Ryzen 7 9800X3D | 96GB G.Skill Ripjaws M5 Neo DDR5-6000 | Asus ProArt RTX 4080 Super | ASUS ROG Strix X870E-E GAMING | Samsung 990Pro 2TB + 990Pro 4TB NMVe | VR: Varjo Aero VPC MT-50CM2 grip on VPForce Rhino with Z-curve extension | VPC CM3 throttle | VPC CP2 + 3 | FSSB R3L | VPC Rotor TCS Plus base with SharKa-50 grip | Everything mounted on Monstertech MFC-1 | VPC R1-Falcon pedals with damper | Pro Flight Trainer Puma OpenXR | PD 1.0 | 100% render resolution | DCS graphics settings Win11 Pro 24H2 - VBS/HAGS/Game Mode ON
antagonist Posted August 15, 2018 Posted August 15, 2018 So do I, but I reckon it depends on the availability of proper reliable information: We know the R-27 missile family's shape, and wind tunnel test software has become pretty accurate nowadays. On account of that, I think eventually there will be an update for all missiles currently implemented in DCS.
Cik Posted August 16, 2018 Posted August 16, 2018 guidance logic is what screws you, not necessarily speed. launched from 1.4m and high the R-27ER achieves a really great range. problem is 1. chaff will decoy with 100% effectiveness, and 2. it will "follow your nose" so tiny jinks on your part will have it doing 100% fin deflection the whole way in while it bleeds off it's mach 5 energy achieving nothing of value.
Recommended Posts