Real Simulator FSSB two assembly option.

[bies]

I saw there are two assembly option. I have read theory behind them on their page, but which option is more useful practically; replacing Warthog's electronic or using it?

cheers

[Lobinjaevel]

You don't really need the warthog PCB for it to work, that's just if you want to be able to still map all the buttons as a warthog stick, and just the axis on the fssb.

 

I only use the FSSB and see no negativ side to that, it's just an opition if you want to map it as a warthog for any reason :)

[Ranma13]

If you use TARGET, then you'll want to go with using the Warthog base's electronics. Otherwise, there's no need. With the Warthog's electronics, the base will need 2 USB cables, one for the stick's buttons so that TARGET still recognizes it as a TM Warthog base, and another for the FSSB R3 base so that it can use the force sensors.

[bies]

You don't really need the warthog PCB for it to work, that's just if you want to be able to still map all the buttons as a warthog stick, and just the axis on the fssb.

 

I only use the FSSB and see no negativ side to that, it's just an opition if you want to map it as a warthog for any reason :)

 

And using FSSB electronics i will be able to use and map all normal Warthog stick buttons? Or i'm going to miss something?

 

BTW. When it comes to Target i don't use it since everything works out of the box.

[Ranma13]

Yes, the Warthog stick works perfectly fine on the FSSB R3 with all buttons supported. The only reason why you'd want to go the two-board route is if you need TARGET's programming capabilities. Otherwise, it's pointless to install the Warthog base's board.