Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
Probably nothing for years to come since the phys GPU is actualy a graphical enhancement feature and has no aplication for FM whatsoever.

 

I don't agree if you mean FM as general. IMHO it will be up to developers to transfer some "physics" to the new chip. Lets put BS aside. I doubt it will see any implementation of such features ever.

 

It can't be purely graphical because it's (PhysicX) features affects movement of objects rather than their look/rendering.

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

A physics chip could in theory lessen the processors workload for a number of things. Explosions come to mind instantly. Having dedicated processing for explosions, smoke, and fire would be a nice step forward. You could also use it for balistics, and with some creativity, probably flight models too. Explosions would be the easiest thing, probably, but anything involving wind, gravity, etc calculations could probably take advantage of it.

Posted
A physics chip could in theory lessen the processors workload for a number of things. Explosions come to mind instantly. Having dedicated processing for explosions, smoke, and fire would be a nice step forward. You could also use it for balistics, and with some creativity, probably flight models too. Explosions would be the easiest thing, probably, but anything involving wind, gravity, etc calculations could probably take advantage of it.

 

Are you saying that PhysiX promo videos show those great real-time calculated animations with exclusion of influence of gravity? :)

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...