Blinky.ben Posted November 5, 2020 Share Posted November 5, 2020 I know this topic has been brought up before, however it has been some time now so is it possible to revisit the load outs again? E.g BRM’s on inner pylons and dual mk82’s and so forth. thanks 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shrike88 Posted November 5, 2020 Share Posted November 5, 2020 And gunpods ;) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mike_Romeo Posted November 5, 2020 Share Posted November 5, 2020 Source: https://forums.eagle.ru/forum/english/licensed-third-party-projects/deka-ironwork-simulations/jf-17-thunder/281797-rockets-on-podd-3-5/page3 My skins Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SuumCuique Posted November 6, 2020 Share Posted November 6, 2020 I would also like to know if Deka is considering adding single snake eyes and Mk.20 cluster bombs to the inner pylon. Their omission is weird after the Mk.82 and GBU-12 were added. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[VFA-106] Glacier Posted November 6, 2020 Share Posted November 6, 2020 I would also like to know if Deka is considering adding single snake eyes and Mk.20 cluster bombs to the inner pylon. Their omission is weird after the Mk.82 and GBU-12 were added. Yeah, I don't quite get that either. If the pylons are compatible with the munitions, and they are, and if munition exhaust ingestion isn't an issue, and it wouldn't be, then it seems like it should be allowed. There's already a precedent for allowing loadouts that, while feasible, aren't typically used in real life, so saying that, for example, no country loads Snake Eyes on the inner pylons doesn't seem valid, unless Deka is making the point that ED is doing things wrong. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts