Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Hi

 

Id like to clarify this once and for all please;)

 

Im gonna be buying an ATI HD4870 1gb to play DCS:BS almost exclusively.

 

Is there any performance benefit to going to a hD4870x2?

 

Most users have commented that Lomac/BS do not support SLI/Crossfire but I wonder if higher levels of AA/AF eye candy options are available 'for free' so to speak (No FPS hit) with a dual card.

 

Would users of a 4870x2 (preferably running at 2560x1600) please comment on whether turning off the second core of their cards affects FPS/AA/AF/Graphics options in any way?

 

I realise this might be a niche group but I only really need one definitive post and answer;)

 

 

Ps. Yes i know DCS:BS is cpu limited. Yes i know the GTX280 is the fastest single chip card. yes i know the GTX260 216 is a great deal....but this question relates only to 4870x2 at 25x16 only please!

 

Pps. happy new year.

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]



64th "Scorpions" Aggressor Squadron

Discord: 64th Aggressor Squadron

TS: 195.201.110.22

Posted

Not to sound like a bother but... I have dual core and the sim runs better when the affinity is set to 2 CPU's and I am running a 8800m SLI (twin chip single gcard) with 1000meg. If I disable either the sim crawls.

 

Dell 1730 XPS Vista 32 Nvdia 8800M SLI 4gig Duo 2.4 Track IR3

Posted

I have a 4870x2 on a 27" @ 1920x1200

 

I did some test runs to check it out here are the results.

 

1. Cat AI set to standard ( default ) , both gpus ran at about 30% usage

Cpu usage was about 70%

 

2. Cat AI set to advanced , both gpus ran at 30% again but frame rate was less consistant and more stuttery ( not good ) , cpu usage 70% as before.

 

3. Cat AI to off ( crossfire off ) , single gpu ran at about 60%ish , cpu usage about 70% as before.

 

Heres the kicker , the frame rates on all modes ...... were about the same , with advanced showing some stuttering. frame rate was between 40-60 on average but got real low in towns sub 20-fps

 

With both the GPU and CPU not getting near 100% I would say that game is neither gpu or cpu limited , but poor programming / optimisation limited.

 

I tried manually setting some AA on 2x , AF x2 , it didnt drop the frame rate much 1 or 2 fps.

 

My thoughts , once I get my GTX280 back from repair , I will be getting rid of this 4870x2 , the card is good but not great certainly not £370 great.

I am not alone in this opinion , I have read several other posts with people going from GTX280 -> 4870x2 -> GTX280 again.

 

The gtx280 gives me better performance on most games I play and the frame rates are far more consistant. The 4870x2 is good on paper and on

benchmarks but is lacking in actual game performance.

 

Arma , Black shark , cod 4 , Company of heroes , IL-2 , Vegas 2 , silent hunter 3 , sins of a solar empire

 

Tests done on XP32 bit

  • Like 2
Posted

It is nice to hear the opinion and thoughts of someone who has actually owned both of these high end GFX cards.:thumbup:

Asus Z390 Code XI, i9-9900K, RAM 32 Gig Corsair Vengeance @ 3200, RTX 2080 TI FE, TIR 5, Samsung 970 EVO 1TB, HOTAS WH, ASUS ROG Swift PG279Q, HTC Vive Pro, Win 10 x64

Posted
I have a 4870x2 on a 27" @ 1920x1200

 

I did some test runs to check it out here are the results.

 

1. Cat AI set to standard ( default ) , both gpus ran at about 30% usage

Cpu usage was about 70%

 

2. Cat AI set to advanced , both gpus ran at 30% again but frame rate was less consistant and more stuttery ( not good ) , cpu usage 70% as before.

 

3. Cat AI to off ( crossfire off ) , single gpu ran at about 60%ish , cpu usage about 70% as before.

 

Heres the kicker , the frame rates on all modes ...... were about the same , with advanced showing some stuttering. frame rate was between 40-60 on average but got real low in towns sub 20-fps

 

With both the GPU and CPU not getting near 100% I would say that game is neither gpu or cpu limited , but poor programming / optimisation limited.

 

I tried manually setting some AA on 2x , AF x2 , it didnt drop the frame rate much 1 or 2 fps.

 

My thoughts , once I get my GTX280 back from repair , I will be getting rid of this 4870x2 , the card is good but not great certainly not £370 great.

I am not alone in this opinion , I have read several other posts with people going from GTX280 -> 4870x2 -> GTX280 again.

 

The gtx280 gives me better performance on most games I play and the frame rates are far more consistant. The 4870x2 is good on paper and on

benchmarks but is lacking in actual game performance.

 

Arma , Black shark , cod 4 , Company of heroes , IL-2 , Vegas 2 , silent hunter 3 , sins of a solar empire

 

Tests done on XP32 bit

 

Thanks. Thats really helpful.

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]



64th "Scorpions" Aggressor Squadron

Discord: 64th Aggressor Squadron

TS: 195.201.110.22

Posted

Yes a very in depth report............I have a 4970x2:helpsmilie:

Asus ROG Crosshair Hero VIII , Ryzen 3900X, Nzxt Kraken Z73, Vengence RBG Pro DDR4 3600mhz 32 GB, 2x Corsair MP 600 pcie4 M.2 2 TB , 2x Samsung Qvo SSD 2x TB, RTX 3090 FE, EVGA PSU 800watt, Steelseries Apex Pro. TM WartHog,TM TPR, Track IR, TM 2 x MFD, Asus VG289Q, Virpil Control Panel#2

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...