Callsign JoNay Posted November 13, 2022 Posted November 13, 2022 According to LunaticFringe, a member of the closed beta testing team, ECM burn through ranges are defined by three simple categories: Strategic Bombers - Burn through at 12nm Fighters - Burn through at 23nm Attack - Burn through 29nm null However in recent community testing on the current open beta, we've discovered inconsistent burn through ranges for fighters. For example you can burn through the ECM of the F-14, F-16, and F-18 at 29nm, while other fighters such as the Jeff, the F-15, and the Su-27 are protected from burn through all the way to 23nm. Just wondering why the F-16, F-18, and F-14 are in the attacker category and not the fighter category? Is this a bug, or by design? PS. There could be even more inconsistencies, I don't believe an extensive test of all airframes has been performed. 5 1
lunaticfringe Posted November 13, 2022 Posted November 13, 2022 (edited) There's some crossover between what would normally be considered a fighter versus attacker. What should be clarified in some fashion is how these evaluations are being made. Edited November 13, 2022 by lunaticfringe 1 1
Callsign JoNay Posted December 12, 2022 Author Posted December 12, 2022 Bump. Any clarification on how the above ECM burn through evaluations are being made?
Recommended Posts