Avimimus Posted December 20, 2022 Posted December 20, 2022 Thought I'd produce a link to this here: 4
Ephedrin Posted December 21, 2022 Posted December 21, 2022 You can load it like that, what‘s the problem?
Avimimus Posted December 21, 2022 Author Posted December 21, 2022 19 minutes ago, Ephedrin said: You can load it like that, what‘s the problem? There aren't versions of the VIkhr racks with only two or four tubes mounted. This means that one has to carry a minimum of six anti-tank missiles (which means hundreds of extra kilograms if one is expecting just a couple of targets e.g. during a COIN operation) - with negative impacts to both range and agility. In reality the Vikhr often is carried with only two or four tubes on the racks (both in training and in combat service). The full six-tube configuration is only carried when a large number of targets are anticipated. The Apache module has partially loaded (1xAGM-114, 2xAGM-114, 3xAGM-114) and fully loaded racks. We are proposing that Black Shark III receive partially loaded racks as well (e.g. 2x9A1472, 4x9A1472) as well as full loaded racks. 4
Ephedrin Posted December 22, 2022 Posted December 22, 2022 (edited) vor 5 Stunden schrieb Avimimus: There aren't versions of the VIkhr racks with only two or four tubes mounted. This means that one has to carry a minimum of six anti-tank missiles (which means hundreds of extra kilograms if one is expecting just a couple of targets e.g. during a COIN operation) - with negative impacts to both range and agility. In reality the Vikhr often is carried with only two or four tubes on the racks (both in training and in combat service). The full six-tube configuration is only carried when a large number of targets are anticipated. The Apache module has partially loaded (1xAGM-114, 2xAGM-114, 3xAGM-114) and fully loaded racks. We are proposing that Black Shark III receive partially loaded racks as well (e.g. 2x9A1472, 4x9A1472) as well as full loaded racks. aah, sry, I missed that detail of your heading and only had a look at the picture. Edited December 22, 2022 by Ephedrin
Avimimus Posted June 11, 2023 Author Posted June 11, 2023 Interesting to note that the Sa-342 module has the partial loading ability (as will the OH-58D) and the AH-64... so it is only the Ka-50 and the Mi-24P which lack this feature (and only the Ka-50 really needs it). It is also interesting to note that a lot of aircraft have partially loaded TER racks (e.g. one or two Mavericks per rack). So, this feature is becoming standard.
Lyrode Posted July 16, 2023 Posted July 16, 2023 Once in the dev shots they did show 4 9a4172 each pylon. I thought it would come then, but not yet. 1
Recommended Posts