Jump to content

Multithreading is also significantly affecting mission startup time (attached CPU intensive mission files to test MT)


Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

As most are reporting I am getting a significant increase in performance in attached test missions.
On average I am getting a 90% increase in FPS (from ~40 FPS to ~75 FPS). CPU utilization from 15-20% to 35-40%.

What surprises me is that mission startup time is much quicker also (down from 20s to 11s on Persian Gulf mission attached and from 25s to 14s for the South Atlantic mission attached). This is not because of SSD speed, but probably related to CPU preparing the mission.

Please use the attached CPU intensive missions for your own testing 😀

My spec:

  • Intel i5 11600k
  • Nvidia RTX 2080Ti   
  • SSD PCIE 4.0

PersianGulf - Operation Unified Valley.miz Falklands - Operation Auburn Success.miz

Edited by MIghtymoo
  • Thanks 1

Intel i9 13900K | RTX4090 | 64 Gb DDR4 3600 CL18 | 2Tb PCIe4.0 | Varjo Aero | Pico 4 on WIFI6e | Virtual Desktop running VDXR

Posted

Hi.

Did some testing with your missions, especially the PG one.

I cannot confirm your findings. Load times are quite variable for me and overall there is consistent difference.

But I now found that, MT also works on my system, since with off-MT I get CPU frametimes up to ~16ms, whereas with MT I get mostly 11ms.

But I think this is due the fact, that I already have a good CPU (5800X3D).

  • 5 weeks later...
Posted

For me it's the opposite. Load times are much slower (about 5 times slower) in the multithreaded version.

DCS:A-10C / DCS:Ka-50 / DCS:UH-1H / DCS:Mig21bis / DCS:P-51D / DCS:Mi-8MTV2 / DCS:Fw190D9 / DCS:Bf109K4 / DCS:C-101EB / DCS:L-39C / DCS:F-5E / DCS:Spitfire LF Mk. IX / DCS:AJS37

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...