Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

This video (@12:00) says the afterburning thrust is 84.4, wikipedia says 81.3 -- which one do we have in game? are we missing 4-5% performance?

Posted (edited)

According  to this: https://jf-17.com/engine/

its 81.3

maybe it is a confusion with the proposed Guizhou WS-13 engine, which has 86.4 kN

Edited by Rudel_chw

 

For work: iMac mid-2010 of 27" - Core i7 870 - 6 GB DDR3 1333 MHz - ATI HD5670 - SSD 256 GB - HDD 2 TB - macOS High Sierra

For Gaming: 34" Monitor - Ryzen 3600 - 32 GB DDR4 2400 - nVidia RTX2080 - SSD 1.25 TB - HDD 10 TB - Win10 Pro - TM HOTAS Cougar

Mobile: iPad Pro 12.9" of 256 GB

Posted (edited)
On 10/6/2023 at 2:22 PM, Rudel_chw said:

ts 81.3

RD-93/93MA[edit]

A variant used to power the JF-17 Thunder (FC-1). According to JF-17.com [5] "The most significant difference being the repositioning of the gearbox along the bottom of the engine casing." The Klimov poster at Zhuhai 2010 airshow gave the thrust range of the engine to be 49.4 kN to 84.4 kN wet.[6] 

From Wikipedia (the RD-93 engine page which is actually the RD-33 page with a section on the RD-93).

From here: https://jf-17.com/specifications/

It says 84.4

So, wikipedia for the JF-17 showed 81.3, now it shows 84.4... just curious what the value is for the JF-17 in dcs?

Edited by Napillo
added link to source
Posted
25 minutes ago, Napillo said:

just curious what the value is for the JF-17 in dcs

 

Strangely, the JF-17 DCS manual says:

"Engine: 1 Klimov RD-93 turbofan engine (with afterburning thrust and DEEC)
Military: 49.4 kN (11,105 lbf)
Maximum thrust: 85.3 kN (19,180 lbf)"

 

For work: iMac mid-2010 of 27" - Core i7 870 - 6 GB DDR3 1333 MHz - ATI HD5670 - SSD 256 GB - HDD 2 TB - macOS High Sierra

For Gaming: 34" Monitor - Ryzen 3600 - 32 GB DDR4 2400 - nVidia RTX2080 - SSD 1.25 TB - HDD 10 TB - Win10 Pro - TM HOTAS Cougar

Mobile: iPad Pro 12.9" of 256 GB

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...