Avimimus Posted December 15, 2023 Posted December 15, 2023 So far as I can tell there might be a slight benefit to conventional (forward-aft) rudder pedals in that they have a larger travel so that precise inputs can be made with larger movements. In contrast vertically moving rudder pedals require smaller movements. Is this true? Does anyone know if this makes a difference (e.g. for precision in hovering a helicopter)? Other than that: It appears that conventional pedals can allow toe breaks, whereas 'anti-torque' pedals can be made lighter and more compact without needing to be attached to anything (and can be used more easily on a swivel chair). P.S. I'm looking at VPC WarBRD Rudder Pedals vs. VKB-Sim T-Rudder Pedals Mk.V - so if anyone has comments on those two, I'd be happy for any advice.
MAXsenna Posted December 15, 2023 Posted December 15, 2023 I have the Slaw Rotors. They're excellent and have toe brakes. Sent from my SM-A536B using Tapatalk 1
SharpeXB Posted December 21, 2023 Posted December 21, 2023 The AH-64 actually has toe brakes so that axis is useful. 1 i9-14900KS | ASUS ROG MAXIMUS Z790 HERO | 64GB DDR5 5600MHz | iCUE H150i Liquid CPU Cooler | ASUS TUF GeForce RTX 4090 OC | Windows 11 Home | 2TB Samsung 980 PRO NVMe | Corsair RM1000x | LG 48GQ900-B 4K OLED Monitor | CH Fighterstick | Ch Pro Throttle | CH Pro Pedals | TrackIR 5
MAXsenna Posted December 22, 2023 Posted December 22, 2023 The AH-64 actually has toe brakes so that axis is useful. Very useful actually. And you can mimick the micro switches in the Hind. Sent from my SM-A536B using Tapatalk
Recommended Posts