Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I know that this is probably not on the table (variant is Mig-29A) but nevertheless:

More air-to-ground capabilities would greatly enhance the mission spectrum of the module.

E.g. with a Mig-29SM variant. Till then I have to hope for Mig-23 still being finished 😬

  • Like 1
Posted
10 minutes ago, 0vbb said:

I know that this is probably not on the table (variant is Mig-29A) but nevertheless:

More air-to-ground capabilities would greatly enhance the mission spectrum of the module.

E.g. with a Mig-29SM variant. Till then I have to hope for Mig-23 still being finished 😬

They have the 9.18 SMT radar manual, they seemed interested but more is needed on the cockpit.

Posted
Am 18.10.2024 um 23:09 schrieb F-2:

They have the 9.18 SMT radar manual, they seemed interested but more is needed on the cockpit.

I'm a little bit struggling with finding cockpit pictures of the Mig29-SM (9.13M).

SMT seems to have 2 large MFDs, while SM is similar to S (minus MT) according to this source: https://www.machtres.com/lang1/mig-29.html

 

So I guess the SM cockpit should not have the 2 MFDs like in the SMT (personally, I like "older" planes without large MFDs more)?

Posted
6 hours ago, 0vbb said:

I'm a little bit struggling with finding cockpit pictures of the Mig29-SM (9.13M).

SMT seems to have 2 large MFDs, while SM is similar to S (minus MT) according to this source: https://www.machtres.com/lang1/mig-29.html

 

So I guess the SM cockpit should not have the 2 MFDs like in the SMT (personally, I like "older" planes without large MFDs more)?

It would need at least one MFD, such as MFI-55. I would assume it’d same as SMT just without the hump (Toplivo) 

Black Shark Den Squadron Member: We are open to new recruits, click here to check us out or apply to join! https://blacksharkden.com

E3FFFC01-584A-411C-8AFB-B02A23157EB6.jpeg

Posted (edited)
vor 5 Stunden schrieb AeriaGloria:

It would need at least one MFD, such as MFI-55. I would assume it’d same as SMT just without the hump (Toplivo) 

Good point, can't use that magic Mig21 radar doing Grom 😜

 

War Thunder forums seem to kind of contradict the other source I mentioned, here the SM is just some quite "new" Serbian model:

https://forum.warthunder.com/t/mikoyan-gurevich-mig-29-fulcrum-history-design-performance-dissection/28118

 

Though Wikipedia also mentions the 9.13 Fulcrum-C SM as a main variant.

Edited by 0vbb
Posted
1 hour ago, 0vbb said:

Good point, can't use that magic Mig21 radar doing Grom 😜

 

War Thunder forums seem to kind of contradict the other source I mentioned, here the SM is just some quite "new" Serbian model:

https://forum.warthunder.com/t/mikoyan-gurevich-mig-29-fulcrum-history-design-performance-dissection/28118

 

Though Wikipedia also mentions the 9.13 Fulcrum-C SM as a main variant.

 

New doesn’t always mean extremely advanced. MiG has two tiers of their top end 29, you have the 29M/29K new builds, which aren’t too far from the MiG-35 Russia uses. But for these older airframes 9-12/9-13 being upgraded, the highest level of upgrade they can receive is SMT, with new Zhuk radar/KOLS and MFD. technologically, I would assume it’s in the same level as the original SMT, just no fuel and possible no jammer if they were originally 9.12

Black Shark Den Squadron Member: We are open to new recruits, click here to check us out or apply to join! https://blacksharkden.com

E3FFFC01-584A-411C-8AFB-B02A23157EB6.jpeg

Posted

The MiG-29SM (9.13M) pre-dates the -SMT and was the MiG-29S with the addition of guided air-to-ground armament. This was achieved through further modification to the N019 radar (N019MP) with air-to-surface modes and OLS-M EOS (from MiG-29M). I have seen an old grainy photo of the cockpit once and it was just the original "baseline" pit with the IPV replaced by something that looked like a CRT MFD like the ones used for the old MiG-29M/K test aircraft. 

AFAIK the Serbian MiG-29s were indeed upgraded to a more recent -SM standard - i.e. involving a new EOS with a TV channel and presumably upgraded N019 radar allowing the use of TV and radar guided A2G armament.  

 

Posted
4 minutes ago, AeriaGloria said:

New doesn’t always mean extremely advanced. MiG has two tiers of their top end 29, you have the 29M/29K new builds, which aren’t too far from the MiG-35 Russia uses. But for these older airframes 9-12/9-13 being upgraded, the highest level of upgrade they can receive is SMT, with new Zhuk radar/KOLS and MFD. technologically, I would assume it’s in the same level as the original SMT, just no fuel and possible no jammer if they were originally 9.12

The 9.13M didn't have(still don't) the re-designed cockpit layout of the -SMT and was based on the 9.13 airframe(without the large SMT hump). So the -SM was the first multirole upgrade for the baseline MiG-29 before the more refined -SMT one came along and is still being offered as a "budget" solution. ECM can be provided via external pods.

BTW the -SMT also had the N019MP radar originally and only later got the Zhuk-M - at one point MIG operated with two -SMT standards("SMT-1" and "SMT-2"), for which the only difference was the choice of radars. 

 

Posted
vor 8 Stunden schrieb Seaeagle:

The MiG-29SM (9.13M) pre-dates the -SMT and was the MiG-29S with the addition of guided air-to-ground armament. This was achieved through further modification to the N019 radar (N019MP) with air-to-surface modes and OLS-M EOS (from MiG-29M). I have seen an old grainy photo of the cockpit once and it was just the original "baseline" pit with the IPV replaced by something that looked like a CRT MFD like the ones used for the old MiG-29M/K test aircraft. 

AFAIK the Serbian MiG-29s were indeed upgraded to a more recent -SM standard - i.e. involving a new EOS with a TV channel and presumably upgraded N019 radar allowing the use of TV and radar guided A2G armament.  

 

Thanks for the detailed explanation!

That's what I was roughly guessing at first based on Wikipedia and the first mentioned source in this thread.

I guess that would also be easier to add compared to the large SMT overhaul.

Posted
On 10/21/2024 at 10:17 AM, 0vbb said:

Thanks for the detailed explanation!

That's what I was roughly guessing at first based on Wikipedia and the first mentioned source in this thread.

I guess that would also be easier to add compared to the large SMT overhaul.

You are welcome 🙂 

 

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...