OhNoMyHookBroke Posted yesterday at 02:53 AM Posted yesterday at 02:53 AM (edited) Literally what the title says lol. I believe the HH-60G would be such a better fit for DCS than the UH-60M. Radar, touchscreen display with camera, IFR probe, capability of crew chiefs fixing the guns forward and letting the pilot shoot them (there's your DAP), sexy analogue Blackhawk cockpit, with a good mix of gauges and displays, and so much more I understand that the UH-60M could provide more specific purpose to DCS that ED really wants to capitalize on, especially with the dynamic campaign starting to pop up more, but in my opinion, the HH-60G is a better fit for DCS Snapinsta.app_video_AQPpSt04CadaSb8phiHPvAFT_b_EqK5aerk2VvYBuyJrtMT9idzMrvFchXDKQkfVFn82rqwQe1iHXL8tvXCESi5qXeH5q_LcTC1QTBg (1) (1).mp4 Edited yesterday at 02:54 AM by OhNoMyHookBroke
Northstar98 Posted 19 hours ago Posted 19 hours ago 11 hours ago, OhNoMyHookBroke said: I understand that the UH-60M could provide more specific purpose to DCS Not really - it fits the GWOT and imagined scenarios and not much else. HH-60G if one could be done would fit so much more (end of Cold War, Gulf War, Iraq War and GWOT), as well as being a contemporary to the DCS AH-64 (which predates UH-60M introduction by almost half a decade) and Mi-8MTV2. But if the HH-60G cannot be done, I'd personally prefer a UH-60L (fits the same scenarios as the HH-60G (and by extension the UH-60M), but can cosplay as Cold War UH-60A better. I don't really understand why ED are so seemingly adamant on only doing an M. 2 Modules I own: F-14A/B, F-4E, Mi-24P, AJS 37, AV-8B N/A, F-5E-3, MiG-21bis, F-16CM, F/A-18C, Supercarrier, Mi-8MTV2, UH-1H, Mirage 2000C, FC3, MiG-15bis, Ka-50, A-10C (+ A-10C II), P-47D, P-51D, C-101, Yak-52, WWII Assets, CA, NS430, Hawk. Terrains I own: South Atlantic, Syria, The Channel, SoH/PG, Marianas. System: GIGABYTE B650 AORUS ELITE AX, AMD Ryzen 5 7600, Corsair Vengeance DDR5-5200 32 GB, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070S FE, Western Digital Black SN850X 1 TB (DCS dedicated) & 2 TB NVMe SSDs, Corsair RM850X 850 W, NZXT H7 Flow, MSI G274CV. Peripherals: VKB Gunfighter Mk.II w. MCG Pro, MFG Crosswind V3 Graphite, Logitech Extreme 3D Pro.
OhNoMyHookBroke Posted 15 hours ago Author Posted 15 hours ago (edited) 4 hours ago, Northstar98 said: Not really - it fits the GWOT and imagined scenarios and not much else. HH-60G if one could be done would fit so much more (end of Cold War, Gulf War, Iraq War and GWOT), as well as being a contemporary to the DCS AH-64 (which predates UH-60M introduction by almost half a decade) and Mi-8MTV2. But if the HH-60G cannot be done, I'd personally prefer a UH-60L (fits the same scenarios as the HH-60G (and by extension the UH-60M), but can cosplay as Cold War UH-60A better. I don't really understand why ED are so seemingly adamant on only doing an M. 100% agree with you. Personally, if you asked me, it's because the modules with glass cockpits probably sell better, considering the majority of DCS players probably like that. Also, the AH-64D and CH-47F both have glass cockpits, so that could be another reason as to why they want to do a UH-60M. But I'm not a fan of the M, and I'd much rather have a UH-60L or even a UH-60A if an HH-60G is not possible. Edited 15 hours ago by OhNoMyHookBroke 1
Recommended Posts