MiG-29S guidance SNP-2

[AeriaGloria]

8 hours ago, MA_VMF said:

The N001 has a TWS mode. However, the outdated weapon control system and R-27 missiles do not allow firing at the target in the TWS.To use the R-77, the weapon control system was replaced and changes were made to the radar algorithm.

The 9-13S uses a weapon control system from the more advanced MiG-29M. RLPK-29M, which means firing two targets in the game in STT mode is a bug, as is a single target when using R-77 missiles.

Okay how is the TWS mode activated in N-001? In Su-27SK manual I find no switch labeled TWS/TWF and no radar function described as such. 

Edited 6 hours ago by AeriaGloria

[AeriaGloria]

6 hours ago, MA_VMF said:

I'm sorry, but it's full of nonsense.This is only according to his information.Which he did not prove in any way. The P-77 cannot be launched in STT. It works according to a different algorithm in which an overview of other goals is preserved.

It does not need to though. As the manufacturer describes it, the datalink process is seemingly identical to R-27 and that is the only interaction between it and the host during missile flight. It gets updates in Cartesian coordinates from the radar and target size. That’s all it needs. It even calculates pitbull on its own. And any R-27R/ER carrier can send datalink updates in STT for up to two missiles 

Edited 6 hours ago by AeriaGloria

[okopanja]

2 hours ago, AeriaGloria said:

t does not need to though. As the manufacturer describes it, the datalink process is seemingly identical to R-27 and that is the only interaction between it and the host during missile flight. It gets updates in Cartesian coordinates from the radar and target size. That’s all it needs. It even calculates pitbull on its own. And any R-27R/ER carrier can send datalink updates in STT for up to two missiles 

While the description in this not too technical article could be applied both to R-27R and R-77, we can not be sure that R-77 operates precisely the same. Simply the level of details is not enough, this is informational article for someone who is not too deep into electronics. 

Furthermore they had to place additional installation into the radar itself.

[AeriaGloria]

4 hours ago, okopanja said:

While the description in this not too technical article could be applied both to R-27R and R-77, we can not be sure that R-77 operates precisely the same. Simply the level of details is not enough, this is informational article for someone who is not too deep into electronics. 

Furthermore they had to place additional installation into the radar itself.

Well, I did try to say “seemingly” identical, as in, as far as we can tell

Because of course here the missile is generating the “activate seeker” command and not the plane sending it. 

Just trying to say there is nothing incompatible between STT and R-77, an overview of the airspace is not a requirement, and that these PD radars of the 80s were originally designed to transmit datalink during STT in any case. 

I wouldn’t be surprised if it used barker code like the R-27!

Edited 44 minutes ago by AeriaGloria

[MA_VMF]

6 часов назад, AeriaGloria сказал:

It does not need to though. As the manufacturer describes it, the datalink process is seemingly identical to R-27 and that is the only interaction between it and the host during missile flight. It gets updates in Cartesian coordinates from the radar and target size. That’s all it needs. It even calculates pitbull on its own. And any R-27R/ER carrier can send datalink updates in STT for up to two missiles 

and what does it say about the analogy with the P-27? That's right, nothing