Actium Posted Wednesday at 06:05 PM Posted Wednesday at 06:05 PM (edited) The SA-5 TR has a significantly higher range than its SR. With the TR emitting by default*, an SA-5 battery will lock and shoot a target within ±25° of the TR azimuth angle at ~130 nm range. This is far outside of the TR antenna main lobe width of less than 2°. When this happens, the TR azimuth will suddenly snap from its initial angle by 25° to the azimuth of the approaching aircraft: SA5_TR_Omniscient.trk The TR scans neither azimuth not elevation, sitting still until it magically becomes aware where to aim to lock the aircraft. When approaching 30° off the TR azimuth, it will only lock and engage an F-16 at a range of 70 nm. Presumably, getting the targeting information from its shorter range SR: SA_TR_Normal.trk *) Apart from the TR magically picking up targets outside of its antenna main lobe, I doubt it would be continuously emitting. Firstly, it would give away its location, inviting ARM attacks. Secondly, unlike an SR, the TR electronics would likely not be designed to emit continuously for hours/days, causing unnecessary wear and thus premature hardware failure. SA5_TR_Test.miz Edited 6 hours ago by Actium Added screenshots, .miz, and link to 5M68V specs
Northstar98 Posted Wednesday at 10:45 PM Posted Wednesday at 10:45 PM The thing is though, this bug has the side-effect of giving the SA-5 a more realistic engagement envelope, which would otherwise be significantly degraded if it were completely reliant on the P-19 or ST-68U - radars which are wholly inaccurate to the SA-5 short of an IADS set up DCS doesn't support. If we had the radars the system is supposed to have, then sure. Modules I own: F-14A/B, F-4E, Mi-24P, AJS 37, AV-8B N/A, F-5E-3, MiG-21bis, F-16CM, F/A-18C, Supercarrier, Mi-8MTV2, UH-1H, Mirage 2000C, FC3, MiG-15bis, Ka-50, A-10C (+ A-10C II), P-47D, P-51D, C-101, Yak-52, WWII Assets, CA, NS430, Hawk. Terrains I own: South Atlantic, Syria, The Channel, SoH/PG, Marianas. System: GIGABYTE B650 AORUS ELITE AX, AMD Ryzen 5 7600, Corsair Vengeance DDR5-5200 32 GB, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070S FE, Western Digital Black SN850X 1 TB (DCS dedicated) & 2 TB NVMe SSDs, Corsair RM850X 850 W, NZXT H7 Flow, MSI G274CV. Peripherals: VKB Gunfighter Mk.II w. MCG Pro, MFG Crosswind V3 Graphite, Logitech Extreme 3D Pro.
okopanja Posted Wednesday at 11:44 PM Posted Wednesday at 11:44 PM (edited) Yes for better immersion, we miss here at least P-14 and matching PRV height radar. Edited 17 hours ago by okopanja Condition: green
Actium Posted 5 hours ago Author Posted 5 hours ago I agree. It's a shame that adding an EWR to the group won't change a thing in vanilla DCS. Regardless, the higher detection range in a ~50° sector is nonsensical.
Recommended Posts