draconus Posted November 15 Posted November 15 10 hours ago, AndrewDCS2005 said: Also can't reproduce detection of tightly packed Mig-31s at more than 100nm. Yeah, I also tried 12 White Swans and it was the same 110nm detection. Win10 i7-10700KF 32GB RTX4070S Quest 3 T16000M VPC CDT-VMAX TFRP FC3 MiG-29A F-14A/B F-15E CA SC NTTR PG Syria
Sancte_Michael Posted November 17 Posted November 17 I hit/killed a TU-22 at 157nm with an AIM-54C mk47. I locked it at 160nm but with the 3 second launch delay the missile came off the rail at 157nm. 160 Mile AIM-54C kill.trk
Panny Posted November 17 Posted November 17 Hmm, perhaps something changed? It was around 2021... Website | Digital Coalition Air Force | Discord CPU: AMD R9950X \ Mobo: MSI MPG X670E Gaming Carbon WiFi \ RAM: Corsair Vengeance 96GB 6000MT/s \ GPU: RTX 5090 \ Various SSDs
AndrewDCS2005 Posted Saturday at 11:05 AM Author Posted Saturday at 11:05 AM (edited) @Sancte_Michael thats cool! your ownship 50kft@M1.75 is a differentiator - missile covered 50nm after 100s of mid-battery life (vs 47nm in my best attempt). Great avatar for the topic and great hit for first post Assuming you are coming back to forum after many years of DCS? Edited Saturday at 11:06 AM by AndrewDCS2005
Recommended Posts