Wolf85 Posted January 22, 2010 Posted January 22, 2010 Is there a big difference in the 4 options? Whant about (every frame)? Thank you :)
Prophet4no1 Posted January 22, 2010 Posted January 22, 2010 I have noticed no visual or performance differance from any of them. [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]
EtherealN Posted January 22, 2010 Posted January 22, 2010 Note that it's Skhval/ABRIS that it affects, not cockpit textures. [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] Daniel "EtherealN" Agorander | Даниэль "эфирныйн" Агорандер Intel i7 2600K @ 4.4GHz, ASUS Sabertooth P67, 8GB Corsair Vengeance @ 1600MHz, ASUS GTX 560Ti DirectCU II 1GB, Samsung 830series 512GB SSD, Corsair AX850w, two BENQ screens and TM HOTAS Warthog DCS: A-10C Warthog FAQ | DCS: P-51D FAQ | Remember to read the Forum Rules | | | Life of a Game Tester
Frederf Posted January 22, 2010 Posted January 22, 2010 Normally the Shkval and ABRIS run at half the frame rate of the rest of the simulation. "Every frame" is an option to double the frame rate of these displays. 256 is the lower resolution of the displays while 512 is the higher option.
Haukka81 Posted January 22, 2010 Posted January 22, 2010 512 and 1024 ;) Oculus CV1, Odyssey, Pimax 5k+ (i5 8400, 24gb ddr4 3000mhz, 1080Ti OC ) [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]
Recommended Posts