Help according Thrust

[A.S]

-100's, just as long as you remember that the -220's will out-perform the -100's, especially in supersonic regimes (in some cases by a LOT).

 

just looked them side by side....220 is higher better

[GGTharos]

Yes, better thrust at altitude.

It also actually (IIRC) removes the V-Max mode that the -100 had because you can program the engine to run V-Max like profiles without destroying the engine (the fact that the -220 is made with more heat-resistant materials especially helps this)

[A.S]

PS: @yoyo ..i hear you ...but and maybe therefore

 

a proper description of how to use the integrity check under

 

Eagle Dynamics\LockOn Flaming Cliffs 2\Config\network.cfg

 

server = {

disable_events = false,

client_params = "motd=\"Welcome to Flaming Cliffs 2 server!\";",

pause_on_load = true,

max_players = 32,

name = "FC2",

client_outbound_limit = 0,

client_inbound_limit = 0,

firewall = "upnp",

integrity_check = {"Config/Weapons","Config/Ufos","Config/Grandma"},

 

would be cool, ....or is it already somewhere described and i overlooked it.

 

Im asking for it (as one of the TCL admins) to ensure that everyone uses a proper integrity check setup for online matches in the league. Fair is Fair, cuz right now you can (with standart config) setup your own UFO...

[Scart]

A.S. I was testing FM for Su-27 and F-15C, and I can say that sustained turn rate for both of them for known weights/altitude configurations are within 5% with real data.

For my shame I wasn't insist on modifying perfomance with flaps - I just don't use them as in RL.

and you can't setup your own UFO if server decides that. (you can check the whole directory if you want it)

[A.S]

A.S. I was testing FM for Su-27 and F-15C, and I can say that sustained turn rate for both of them for known weights/altitude configurations are within 5% with real data.

 

I think, i can confirm that...its pretty well done.....my sensitive feeling was irritated only due to lockons limiters...supported by the confusion about actual thrust values used along this thread

.....that threw me off...like "something unnatural here feeling"...but we found out why.

 

PS: is that the way i have to do it? integrity_check = {"Config/Weapons","Config/Ufos","Config/Grandma"}, << like this? (without Grandma :=)

Edited April 3, 2010 by A.S

[Scart]

you can specify the directory you want to be checked - exact spelling is better to get from devs

[Yo-Yo]

I am not the right person to say anything helpful about the integrity checking but I can give some charts instead. :)

 

To show the fidelity, I'd like to present some figures about planes fine tuning.

Some notes:

I must recall that excessive power is the time derivative (Vy or dHe/dt) of energy altitude or full energy divided to mg. LEVEL flight acceleration in g's N_y = Vy/TAS.

So you can see how the differences in itegral acceleration curve (TAS vs time) depends on flight model Vy deviation from the real values.

Please keep in mind that Vy curves for F-15 was obtained from its acceleration charts and can not be presumed very accurate. That's why the ultimate reference is acceleration chart.

 

And finally: after I made these charts CLT for F-15 drag is slightly reduced so the curves will match better.

[A.S]

Roger, first i have to find out what files can be allowed to be changed (gfx etc etc) and what files cant be touched under any circumstances (FM, weapons, settings etc etc)

 

then i have to upload a tcl-network.cfg on tcl page so everyone is using same gurantee check in competitions.

[GGTharos]

Thanks for the charts Yo-Yo :)

[Scart]

as for me, I would like have the AoA & G limiters off ingame - it will make the dogfights much more exciting especially considering that in RL in all planes planes flyable in LO pilot can overforce it and make it higher

[A.S]

thx Yoyo ...check PM

[GGTharos]

Scart, I agree, but I think that these edges of envelope might be something the FM cannot handle well. This is only a guess on my part.

 

But because we have a more realistic g model now, we don't have to worry about people holding 12g.

[Scart]

Scart, I agree, but I think that these edges of envelope might be something the FM cannot handle well. This is only a guess on my part.

 

But because we have a more realistic g model now, we don't have to worry about people holding 12g.

I don't bother how FM will hold it up far away from the normal fly - it can be stall or enormous speed bleeed or deep over G - every factor will make it user to feel bad - at least if it possible we can make it optional within сfg files. But it is not good enough when the most hard work is made by the limiter Edited April 3, 2010 by Scart