Steel Jaw Posted August 28, 2010 Posted August 28, 2010 (edited) Are the avionics and radar replicated exactly, I mean are they carried over exactly? Or has the FC2 Flanker been dumbed down? Reading my Flanker 2.0 manual. Edited August 28, 2010 by Mower "You see, IronHand is my thing" My specs: W10 Pro, I5/11600K o/c to 4800 @1.32v, 64 GB 3200 XML RAM, Red Dragon 7800XT/16GB, monitor: GIGABYTE M32QC 32" (31.5" Viewable) QHD 2560 x 1440 (2K) 165Hz.
Boberro Posted August 28, 2010 Posted August 28, 2010 As far I know Flanker's Su-33 was totally unrealistic and in LO Su-33 has been dumbed down to more "real". Reminder: Fighter pilots make movies. Bomber pilots make... HISTORY! :D | Also to be remembered: FRENCH TANKS HAVE ONE GEAR FORWARD AND FIVE BACKWARD :D ಠ_ಠ ツ
GGTharos Posted August 28, 2010 Posted August 28, 2010 They were not replicated exactly. The FC2 Su-27 is a little closer to reality, but both of them are not giving you the true representation of the radar modes (exact details regarding those radars were not available until well after they were coded, and at this point it was simply too late to invest in changing them up). Are the avionics and radar replicated exactly, I mean are they carried over exactly? Or has the FC2 Flanker been dumbed down? Reading my Flanker 2.0 manual. [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] Reminder: SAM = Speed Bump :D I used to play flight sims like you, but then I took a slammer to the knee - Yoda
Recommended Posts