aoalimiter Posted July 17, 2005 Posted July 17, 2005 :p :p - To prevent false target indications, the forward RWR antennas are blocked during radar transmissions. This is very important to note: if the radar is in operation, the pilot will get NO RWR warning from a forward quarter emitter. и что нам теперь делать при перехвате империалистических, захватничиских, воздушных целей ? 2Плагият, это не мог написать серьезный человек, только империалистический идиот.... :rolleyes: :rolleyes: РЛС Н019 в режиме обзора непредлагает летчику информацию о высоте цели. Тоже если пет информации о высоте цели от КП, летчик может нажать кнопку СПО-ОБЗОР и на индикаторе СПО увидить если цель вверх/вниз чем Миг-29. Конечно, РЛС цели нужна была быть также в режиме излучения. Просто такая обычай для летчиков наших ВВС. Eсть это одновременная работа СПО и РЛС в передней полусфере или нет? С уважением AOA
Dmut Posted July 17, 2005 Posted July 17, 2005 aoalimiter, you may write in english if you want to. it might be more understandable though. plagiat talk about possible incompatibility between radar and RWR on particular russian planes. and you talking about altitude of targets... Sorry, I can't get it... "There are five dangerous faults which may affect a general: recklessness, which leads to destruction; cowardice, which leads to capture; a hasty temper, which can be provoked by insults; a delicacy of honor which is sensitive to shame; over-solicitude for his men, which exposes him to worry and trouble." Sun Tzu [sigpic]http://forums.eagle.ru/signaturepics/sigpic2354_5.gif[/sigpic]
aoalimiter Posted July 17, 2005 Posted July 17, 2005 DMut, At first you should chceck the first page, please. :icon_wink He picked up some sentences from an article dealing the SPO-15 problems with the SU-27/Mig-29 radar. I answered with an example taken from the Mig-29 service. The RWR SPO-15 can be used to gain the altitude information (also direction,etc) of the enemy a/c in general (below/above) during the N019 radar engagement, thus it denies what mentioned in that statement. That`s all. Понятно? Если вам нужно на русском языку, я напишу. regards АОА
Dmut Posted July 17, 2005 Posted July 17, 2005 yes, I've heard both positive and negative acknowledgment about that issue with H-001\019 and SPO-15. Some pilots confirm it and some deny. Official documents and pilots manuals deny the existence of that issue, that's why ED didn't impelement it in LO. ps: you may post in russian or english, whatever you like. posts in English are prefferable to address to English part of these forums. "There are five dangerous faults which may affect a general: recklessness, which leads to destruction; cowardice, which leads to capture; a hasty temper, which can be provoked by insults; a delicacy of honor which is sensitive to shame; over-solicitude for his men, which exposes him to worry and trouble." Sun Tzu [sigpic]http://forums.eagle.ru/signaturepics/sigpic2354_5.gif[/sigpic]
aoalimiter Posted July 17, 2005 Posted July 17, 2005 yes, I've heard both positive and negative acknowledgment about that issue with H-001\019 and SPO-15. Some pilots confirm it and some deny. Official documents and pilots manuals deny the existence of that issue, that's why ED didn't impelement it in LO. ps: you may post in russian or english, whatever you like. posts in English are prefferable to address to English part of these forums. Хорошо, понял. :rolleyes:
Recommended Posts