wangfei Posted November 20, 2010 Posted November 20, 2010 Plenty of topics on the issues exist, previous topic was locked. Now created a new topic on the same issue. :mad::mad:LOCKON I want to say love you, is not easy, I Flanker 2.5 to LOCKON1.01, and then to 1.12, and finally to LOCKON1.21! The development of the current LOCKON1.21 is failure, I am a faithful LOCKON lovers, compared with 1.12 in addition to stability in addition to the game, no good place. 120C compared to semi-active missile ER almost the same range, 120 range and is far more than R77, but also a long acceleration time, 120 of the ballistic trajectory design than R77 reasonable. SU27 The only advantage is that according to the radar than the distance, but the missile range limits can be very embarrassing models. mig29S even mention the radar, is simply garbage, plus ET and refuse to refuse to R77, the addition of more fruit there is no fog to the sky for a living drone. If I said that alarmist, all players can try, the performance of these aircraft and missiles, such as official that is to high simulation, it can only say that the Soviet-made weapons are garbage. :mad::mad::mad:
Steel Jaw Posted November 20, 2010 Posted November 20, 2010 Fc2 is LOMAC updated. Carry on. "You see, IronHand is my thing" My specs: W10 Pro, I5/11600K o/c to 4800 @1.32v, 64 GB 3200 XML RAM, Red Dragon 7800XT/16GB, monitor: GIGABYTE M32QC 32" (31.5" Viewable) QHD 2560 x 1440 (2K) 165Hz.
Boberro Posted November 20, 2010 Posted November 20, 2010 Lock on is not high end simulator so.... Anyway LO2 is the best LOMAC so far. Get over it. Reminder: Fighter pilots make movies. Bomber pilots make... HISTORY! :D | Also to be remembered: FRENCH TANKS HAVE ONE GEAR FORWARD AND FIVE BACKWARD :D ಠ_ಠ ツ
RIPTIDE Posted November 20, 2010 Posted November 20, 2010 :mad::mad:LOCKON I want to say love you, is not easy, I Flanker 2.5 to LOCKON1.01, and then to 1.12, and finally to LOCKON1.21! The development of the current LOCKON1.21 is failure, I am a faithful LOCKON lovers, compared with 1.12 in addition to stability in addition to the game, no good place. 120C compared to semi-active missile ER almost the same range, 120 range and is far more than R77, but also a long acceleration time, 120 of the ballistic trajectory design than R77 reasonable. SU27 The only advantage is that according to the radar than the distance, but the missile range limits can be very embarrassing models. mig29S even mention the radar, is simply garbage, plus ET and refuse to refuse to R77, the addition of more fruit there is no fog to the sky for a living drone. If I said that alarmist, all players can try, the performance of these aircraft and missiles, such as official that is to high simulation, it can only say that the Soviet-made weapons are garbage. :mad::mad::mad: Before this gets locked (and it probably will, just like the last one lol)... R27ER is well above range of 120C. 120C should be well above range of R-77, as it should be. The Mig-29 radar is garbage by comparison as it is in real life. The Mig is the red headed child of the 3 "fighters" because IMO it is a point defence under CGI guidance, short range scrapper. It's not worthy to bring tea to the Su-27 or F-15C, never mind been compared in the same thread. There are only a handful of Su-27 pilots that actually know how to fly it as-its-meant-to-be-flown, in a multiplayer environment with a view to complete success. That is my opinion and your mileage may vary. [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]
Panzertard Posted November 20, 2010 Posted November 20, 2010 (edited) These are all survey sims, it's been debated all over the place. Here's a few searched: FC2 A2A Changes SU-27 need corrections in FC2.0 Missiles changes in FC 2.0 We do not need another thread about this. Your previous was closed, now this one. Warning issued. Edited November 20, 2010 by Panzertard The mind is like a parachute. It only works when it's open | The important thing is not to stop questioning
Recommended Posts