Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

How is getting systems behaviour mixed up something else than any other bug? It's hardly the first time a problem of this type has surfaced, in LOMAC or sims in general.

 

There is a multitude of perfectly mundane reasons why this bug may have reared its head - perhaps they thought it worked like that back then? Maybe it was a known issue which they simply didn't get around to fixing earlier?

 

Seriously, your question is rather perculiar even though I don't see any reason why ED should not answer it. This is akin to asking the cook why he mistakenly added too much salt to the soup - AFTER he has apologised and promised to do better next time ;)

Posted

Maybe they dont know.

 

Maybe they were paid by Sukhoi to do it wrong and that is why we are getting stony silence :D jk jk jk

 

Its likely they just got it wrong, either in researching or programming (I suppose they could say this though).

Posted
The question is not provocative enough to provoke an response, obviously.

 

Eh...hehe...that was actually quite cunning Goya :icon_jook

 

Cheers,

- JJ.

JJ

Posted
Hey Goya, it's time to let it go....

 

I let it go yesterday. I just wanted to clarify what the question actually was.

 

To be able to speak to the devs directly in this forum is a very nice way of getting real information rather than theories. It just didn't work this time. That's unfortunate. The fact that ED chose not to answer will factor into many people's guesses as to how this happened, I'll bet.

 

Oh well, back to bitching about the F-15's nav problems. ;)

Posted
Could you put that into context, please?

There is not much of context there for this post. One guy suggests to put some most critical fixes in the patch and release it right now. And pospone all other stuff like avionics imrovements/weapons fixes (ARH logic)/radards in the paid addod with Ka-50. In response to it Valery said what I quoted and added that "Well, it was decided to make the patch so WE are going to decide what to put in it and what to not..."

 

Also I might add this: it seems from this thread that ED position is that main purpose of patches is to produce stable product. This is primary target. All enchancements and fixes of 'logic' errors like the one that you brought here is secondary.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...