LOMAC or Falcon Allied Force

[Sgt.York.AWG]

Which is more realistic? LOMAC or Falcon Allied Force

[Guest IguanaKing]

That's a question that doesn't really have an all-encompassing answer. In some respects LOMAC is more realistic. In other respects, F4AF is more realistic.

[rasputin]

IMO, Lomac gives you the edge in flight models, aerial combat and formation flying...not to mention more realistic visuals. F4 has a clickable pit, better comms, it's a better all-around war simulator and it has that big, bad heavy stick...the dynamic campaign.

 

I "feel" like I'm flying in Lomac so it's my fav of the two. :)

[Wombat1940]

I think they both have there place, LOMAC-FC great graphics but no dynamic campaigns, Falcon4AF good graphics (particularly with the addon HiTiles) and has dynamic campaigns. I play both.

 

Oops! I've said elsewhere I wouldn't get into pros ans cons ..... Wombat out .....:redface:

[britgliderpilot]

There's only one possible answer to that:

 

 

Both.

 

 

No self-respecting flight simmer should be without either one - there's no possible way I can actually recommend you not buy one of the two, for any reason.

[walternowi]

There's only one possible answer to that:

 

 

Both.

 

 

No self-respecting flight simmer should be without either one - there's no possible way I can actually recommend you not buy one of the two, for any reason.

 

Ditto