Jump to content

Leaderboard

Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation on 05/05/05 in Posts

  1. This mod is LoMan compatible and works for LockOn 1.02 and 1.1FC. Structure Lights Mod V2 download The structure lights will be brighter and visible from longer distance. The runway lights will be smaller and dimmer. The antenna towers will be seen as red and white from longer distance in the daytime. See this 'before and after' comparison. A larger screenshot is here. Compared to the previous version of the mod, the lights are darker and the lit windows are less, but the pop-up of the objects is less noticeable. For better image quality, higher setting of video AF is recommended. I hope you like it. :)
    2 points
  2. Not quite - similar principle, but much simpler ... literally for the F-15 it is a simple and quick triangulation (only a few seconds), which is something that a sub is not able to do for many reasons, starting with the speed of sound in water, the various sound channels, etcetc. For the 15 it's measure angle, turn, measure angle, compute. Although the aircraft may have shifted position significantly by the time you complete your computation (possibly by as much as 1nm or 2nm for a mach 2 aircraft) it gives you some incertainty in the range, but not large enough to make your shot horrendously unreliable.
    1 point
  3. Подтверждаю. На резюках они конкретно сэкономили.
    1 point
  4. Старая добрая проблема. У всех котоводов которых я знаю - тоже самое. У мя тоже. Не лечиться. :( ...ну может тока если резюки поменять...
    1 point
  5. I'd just like to turn that feature off, please.
    1 point
  6. Handing out points doesn't seem to do anything for yourself. I just handed out 7 points, and I stayed the same.
    1 point
  7. I gave a rep point to someone a little bit ago and my rep points are the same. The plot thickens.
    1 point
  8. The phenomenon with VS picking up a tail-on target out to 50km but head on less than 15 sounds more like it's an issue of using EOS rather than the radar, in which case it's correct - not a bug. I don't know what to say about the radar one. To me it sounds like it would jsut introduce too many false returns and lock onto anything it bloody well pleases, which is why the ranges are limited on these modes, AFAIK. The MiG-29 radar's history is fraught with clutter problems and inadequate processing power, neither of which, AFAIK, is modelled in LOMAC. Incidentally the Su-27's radar, being essentially the same, should be suffering from the same problems. It's probably pretty difficult to model however, and who the heck knows what the false positive rate was on the Eagle's radar, so may as well ingore the whole thing....
    1 point
  9. I returned the favor. :icon_jook After all, we're just conspiring fanbois, aren't we? :icon_roll
    1 point
  10. I very much agree with aleska that there is an issue with the aim 120. I cannot comment on the r77 as I do not fly the mig enough to make a qualified assesment. Hopefully it is being looked at
    1 point
  11. sssshhh.... or helos might turn up. :icon_wink :p
    1 point
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...