Laxxor

No it is entirely illlogical to tell you everything you have some of but not tell you that which you have nothing of.... If you wrote your shopping lists on that premise you would find you are missing something when you went to use it... the issue is that when QTY is 0, the game doesnt even aknowledge there IS such an ordinance shelf that is empty, but _does_ continue to list it in the airfield resources UI.

still issue

i woudl recommend the alternate suggestion made near the start of mkLink /D to redirect the foldername in saved games to any folder of your choice - it acts an an invisible (to the game) redirect

getInventory gives a complete inventory for a warehouse, but seems to exclude items that are fully depleted, instead of returning "0" as the qty. If i use warehouse.getItemCount(wh, <depletedItem>) it will return 0, showing the warehouse has the item, but its qty is 0. why does getInventory exclude 0-qty items?

still an issue - is it an accepted bug?

Still an issue

issue still persists

Still an issue

Bump. Still an issue

Bump. This is still an issue

In order to not feel like champions of the in-game solution were hung out to dry, it would have been really nice to hear about this sooner in the DCS update newsletter, rather than feel like the solution had been shelved and to stumble over the information in a disjointed respository.... @NineLine Its also worth noting that there is a whole section dedicated to Voice chat bugs, but its only this section of the forums being reviewed?

This can be accepted as a solution for the technicals of the warbird placement.. but gazelle remains to be a graphical bug with the module i think (ie outside/inside a re different and overlapping).

@Nealius Right, thats great, but if you refer to my images (in this instance the spitfire ones where the tail number has been set to "bill1949" in the ME) where the serial numbers are reversed, is the representation of the serial numbers IN DCS correct? Left side, read left to right: Bill1949 Right side, read left to right: L1949Lbi

There are 2 sides to the post... fix and enhance I don't understand your "local fog" though, that would make a severe imbalance from a simulation perspective. To be honest I also don't understand why you come out guns blazing at my naivety and borderline futility of intent. It's also borderline (no.... actual) condescending to question my "contacts inside ED management" of which obviously i have none, otherwise i would be talking directly to them in DMs, rather than attract the laughing and finger pointing I'm currently receiving from yourself (who would appear to be a moderately seasoned poster with 4.2K forum posts) who seems to have just "chosen violence" today. Im relatively new to DCS.. maybe i am stealing someone's thunder? You seem to be versed in software development so i would hope you can, as an "Agent of Change" (and if that reference is lost on you try reading "Peopleware" by Timothy Lister and Tom DeMarco), appreciate you dont get change without a catalyst and sometimes you have to just keep trying... I guess the other option is to not try anymore, sit back, exist with the things not working and complain about them on other platforms and do "thumb down" emotes on all the discord announcements, or go to another product... but you know, I chose this way. You do you, dude.

Making things visible in a constructive manor can only be the 1st step though in change process / management, which is why i created this post. Yea there are probably quite a few issues, some with be lost in the depths of old posts, some drowned out by other current issues, and others will be suffered in silence and complained about in the shadows (least helpful). DIscussion and visibility might help people see, and a single point of reference for all the issues makes is easily referenceable. I hope this post c an help promote those aspects...