Floyd1212

Yes, please. This would be a game-changer if it were working properly. @CaptHawk Did you test again after the patch today? Maybe it got fixed but wasn't mentioned in the patch notes?

Agreed, the default should be Hidden on MFDs, and there should be a checkbox for "Show on MFDs". I think most mission-makers would like most objects to remain hidden, and maybe a few key targets to be shown that might be critical to the tasking in the mission.

Here is a mission with a working BUK M3 site using the semi-active TELARs. The player aircraft is an Apache, and is set to invulnerable. Feel free to swap in your favorite ride. I did test it without the CC vehicle or TR, and it still launched on me. CurrentHill BUK M3 Test.miz

Do you have the CC vehicle as part of the group? I fell like I had the same issue, but it’s been a while.

Yes, they need to be installed for each client, and on the server.

Understood. Glad to hear LOD is coming to all your packs. Any reason why the problem would go away for one player while in the Hornet, then come back again in the Apache? That part is what seemed odd to me.

Some of the members of my Apache squadron are experiencing major frame drop when looking in the direction of the Russian S-350 assets. As in, the units are 50 miles away and through mountains, but when looking in their direction the frames drop into the teens. I personally don't have the issue, but several others do. One of them flew a Hornet tonight and didn't experience any frame drop, then got back into the Apache and had the same issue again. Is anyone else experiencing something like this, either in the Apache or otherwise?

The checkbox you are looking for in the ME is "Hidden on MFD", and was added some time ago to serve this purpose. As an example, two FARPs are placed in the ME with the one on the left using the "Hidden on MFD" option. After spawning in, only the FARP on the right is added to the CTRLM database in the aircraft, and the one on the left does not. This works for friendly and enemy units, and other CMs. null

@BIGNEWY Although it is a small percentage of the DCS user-base that uses display exports, it is arguably the most passionate slice of the user-base, and probably the ones that spend the most money on peripherals and modules. ED is constantly thanking us for our "passion and support", but you seem to be ignoring (or at least downgrading) some of the requests from your most passionate supporters. Please consider allocating some resources to this and other "niche" bugs (like display exports being too dark). These passionate users tend to spread the word about how awesome DCS can be, and I would think keeping them happy is worth something.

I had someone hop in my front seat after I had been flying for a bit last night without a crash. This was in a hot-start aircraft. Are you seeing this with hot-start, cold-start, or both?

We were seeing this for a while, but not currently.

We didn't experience this when running rockets in a multi-crew setting the other day. Are you saying when you both WAS'ed rockets you didn't get the COOP indicator in the back seat?

This happens on other maps, as well. It has been discussed before, but possibly related to the date the mission is set to take place? The solution is to enable “Unrestricted SatNav” in the mission, or for your local options.

We still see lots of desync issues in multi-crew. FCR returns not displaying in both crew-stations CPG not seeing waypoints that were loaded with the Route Tool prior to a dynamic spawn PLT seeing the TADS drift on the video feed when the CPG uses IAT (intermittently) DL not being configured (and not working) for CPG when everything looks fine for the PLT

One of the changes made in the last patch is that George does not automatically start up his crewstation in a cold-start aircraft like he used to. After starting up the battery and APU from the back and power is available, pull up the George Interface and give him the command to startup the front seat by pressing your "consent to fire" button. This may not be your issue, but just throwing that out there as a possibility.