Gorn_GER

Hey BN Sorry if I wasn't clear, this is what steam told me. "ED didn't remove them, so kick rocks" I just hate having modules that may work, but will never be completed. (I know, ongoing process, but as a business owner, I've been there. Business is trust.) But yeah. such is life. The module will continue to work with DCS 2.9 Same as the Hawk T.1A continue to work with DCS 2.5.3 But who the hell still uses DCS 2.5.3? Btw. is it somehow possible to download older Versions of DCS and does these older Versions support Multiplayer so you can play this Module with Multicrew in mind together with your friends to experience the whole feeling of the Dsync-Multicrew-Feature that makes you have fun Missing designated strike targets in your two-seat StrikeEagle? I did not refund my F-15E even though I bought it in EDs E-Shop and not stream. Because I was told from officials to hold on for the resolution of this Razbam Situation.

Since Speicherstadt is one of UNESCO world heritage site, I would like to see it one day updated but maybe some day one of the developers have time to do that since they already build some fantastic sites of the map. Because I am from Germany and my main interest for future DCS gameplay focus on ColdWar, it was a Must-Have for me to buy this map on Release day I can confirm what you said in your Text, the developers somehow got this detailed map work as smooth (even in VR) as Syria is. I will build the Future of DCS in this Map from the Past. ColdWar is the Sweetspot between slow Propeller flying (with or against a Nation that is driven by Hate) and Jets so modern that the don’t even see eachother before killing.

nullYour game crashes Midgame in SP mission because your Login Server is down? Why is that nessesary?

as soon as you get used to it, the startup in the Harrier is even faster than in most other Jets. I think only my AJS37 has a faster startup. I prefer to start the Harrier on a Tarawa Flightdeck because the cable link to the Carrier has a faster INS Align than on ground (as far as I remember). While F/A-18 and F-14 still spooling up the second engine, I already am on my way to target. (Downside is the subsonic speed. So F/A-18 CAS/Strike will be early on target anyway ) Another reason to start on the Tarawa is, because it is cool to be the only Jet in DCS that could start and land there. Everyone could start a Plane on a Supercarrier but as long as there is no F-35 Module, you are the only non-Heli player on that Tarawa ^^

This. I would like to use it more and play it togehter with my buddys but I cannot recommand them to buy it. Therefor i would fly it alone and with knowing how incomplete it is. At the weekend i started it since last time about a year ago. After start, on online server, I immediately turned back to airfield and switched to AV8B because it is more fun to play a module that is less raw. Even the F-15C is more fun because it does everything its supposed to do while I just spend some 15$ for Flaming Cliffs or so.

Everything as I said. Interesting to see, where it comes from.

Did you read that in a fortune cookie? Please go to your Car-Dealer, buy a vehicle without an engine and tow it around a little. You know, not putting an engine in the vehicle will give it value, riding it does. If you now start to explain that the F-15E is somehow playable and good as it is, you just tell me that there is no serious way to talk to you. I do not know what state of art the refund options are right now but I was told that there are Topics we can not talk about in this forum. And telling people what rights they have in what countries gets stressfull from time to time.

aged like Milk. Patience needs to be fed with updates and results but I am still waiting to not regret keeping the module when it was possible to refund it earlyer.

I cannot tell if I had the same issue once but to give this something to think about: Due to network limitations most bigger Multiplayer Missions do some tricks to rise performance. If you use TacView after flying a dynamic Mission on an online server while you was alone there, you can observe that the enemy units have 3 states: 1. Active, 2. Not Simulated and 3. not existing. These states are triggered by players flying in several distances to the enemy. In state 3 you cannot even see them, no matter what your view distance is. In state 2 you may not be able to lock them even though you can see them because they may have the same state as terrain buildings and trees. in state 1 they are in normal state and can move/shoot. The Performance on singleplayer Missions are dependend of your Computer hardware. If your computer is able to simulate all of the mission at once and everything in your view distance, you can lock them. maybe someone with more experience in DCS Core code and Mission editing can give you more context for this matter.

no but it seems that not everyone reached that. This Thead is the best example that ED has to put a disclaimer in the Store that Razbam modules are not supported at the moment. If you buy the SE and find this out, ED just gives you the option to return it for store credit, what seems litterly illegal. You cannot sell dead, unfinished products without the option for people to return it for cash. If the buying person is not interested in any other module, what should he buy for that credit? Noone here buys DCS because it is for free. We buy specific modules. null

Either you are trolling or you did not understand what “Disput between ED and Razbam” means. You did not just buy another Razbam module for full price since other modules are on sale at the moment? Did you? do you want to buy Av8B and Mig-19, too? I have some bad news there.

No solution here?

The OH58 looks nice but at the moment, I hold back my wallet because I do not know how ED will handle 3rd party modules in the future. Still waiting for official announcements if it is worth spending money in non-ED modules. I already got UH1, AH64 and KA50. the OH58 would look good between them but it is not an ED module.

Once I were told that since the dispute with VEAO Simulations and the T.1A, ED changed contracts with further developments of 3rd Party Modules so even when the developer disappears, ED could still be able to patch the module with further DCS updates or even keep developing it further if they want. I agree, the Harrier is good as it is at the moment. I never have problems while flying and it is a great work by RB. It is my most used module. I have high hopes for Harrier II Plus one day so I kindly say: #payrazbam (or find another solution to keep working with them) EDIT: @Pipe AJ is called Alpha Juliet as nickname and he was the Community Manager for the Harrier. He Quit his position to do something else he wanted. As far as official information by razbam, he did not quit because of the dispute wit ED. He just stayed some more time when the dispute started, to help out his old team. See more in "Harrier-announcements" on the razbam discord.

For example, the Weapon station button Nr.7 that is the only one that does not visually push in when clicked and no one ever cared? Once I had serious struggles with that button while coding my DCS-Bios for my selfmade cockpit. Tried to fix that button on hardwareside for several hours until I recognised that I never had a problem and all was working but DCS just has no visual push in for that one Button