Gorn_GER

For example, the Weapon station button Nr.7 that is the only one that does not visually push in when clicked and no one ever cared? Once I had serious struggles with that button while coding my DCS-Bios for my selfmade cockpit. Tried to fix that button on hardwareside for several hours until I recognised that I never had a problem and all was working but DCS just has no visual push in for that one Button

No, not like this. Casual players are not interested to search the whole Forum to suddenly find a thread that is some kind of official by ED. The Thead is from 14.November? I just found out today and I am normally browsing in this forum from time to time. what I mean is the website Newsletter or the beta changelogs that everyone gets automatically in every discord server that has a DCS topic. people that gave up to fix the problem with unsafe methods lost interest in forum threads and wait for solution, mentioned in changelogs. with the last open beta patch, my friend just told me “hmm, no performance bug fix in that changelog? I not even try that new version then. I have other things to do.”

two of my friends have similar problems but with worse computer hardware (but everything worked fine with 2.8.XX and we played alot). At the moment it is unplayable for them and they frustrated as they are stoped playing the game what was a big pushback for myself (because i do not like to fly without friends) I have a whole homade flightchair with VR and upgraded my GPU to 4090 just to get buttersmooth VR Gameplay just in DCS (all other games do not care if i have 4090 or way lower) and now i have to play alone and that makes everything lonely and frustrating. Therefor I am looking things up in the Forum since 2.9 release and all the suggestions require deep changes in Windows processes while playing without hope to help. We all are not interested in trying many workarounds that may, may-not work and it is annoying to install software that i do not know and that dos things that I cannot control in hope the Hardware wont brake. I always had the impression, that EDs developer work very hard on problems to fix them ASAP. Since this problem came from 2.9 update, in my opinion this has to be fixed by ED instead of 3rd party software or deleting Windows processes. A game just works when you can play it after installing without further changes in Windows. >1 sec shuttering with specs like i7-11700KF and RTX4060TI are not okay for a game that age. At the moment I am missing the part where ED tells people in the news that there are some unknown shuttering issues where the devs are working on. I think there are people out there wondering if they are the only ones experience this issue. @BIGNEWY maybe you could announce on your Website if the Devs are working on that or not.

Maybe they plan some major updates on av8 after the f15 is some kind of finish. I bought mine with 50% off in 2021. if they announce big changes on an old module, they better find some players that have not bought them already.

First: No. Second: Why would you want to do that? The x56 Base is one of the worse. I would favor to get a x56 Stick on a warthog base than putting a warthog stick on a x56 base. Better not even use the x56 at all. if you can, change stick and base together and get yourself one of the better stuff.

You guys know what the Best part of buying a X56 is? It is the Part where you buy one, play with it for about a year, realize the many major issues with production quality* and than you can lend it to a friend because you got to a point where it is not worth playing it while having the ability to buy a better one instead. So my friend has no money because he is student and now we can fly together. He does not care about all that problems with the X56 because he can use it for free. But anyway, if I had the possibility to go back in time, I would stop myself from Buying the X56 or the Saitek rudder pedals. It may be unfair to compare the X56 with my VKB Gunfighter Ultimate, Virpil Throttle and Thrustmaster TPR Rudder because of the price distance between it but there are possibilities to construct cheaper equipment by a company like Logitech that could work as good as the expensive stuff without the big problems the X56 has. I am wondering why logitech still sells that stuff. > In Europe they want about 220€ on amazon for that garbage and you can get a Warthog for 449€. I see the problem here. The quality of the Warthog is not as good as it was worth double the price. But the biggest downsides of the X56 are worth, not even trying it. If people have no money, go and buy T.Flight HOTAS X for 60€. I had that thing for years, playing Operation Flashpoint and ArmA with it. Playing F-15C with HOTAS X in DCS could be 60€+7,49$ fun, too. But trying to play F-15E for 220€+63.99$ with the X56 could be a nightmare at some point. If I have 63,99$ for F-15E, I can get myself some 449€ Warthog * Quality issues: - Self moving throttle (could not hold its own position because of bad constructed brake) - mini joysticks wandering around because of bad centering. - one mini joystick keep sticking in position (not recentering) after moving it all way to the left - bad Joystick centering because of silly spring construction, causing the plane to always turn (when programming a big deadzone, you will have problems with low sensitivity while adjusting your flight) - really unnecessary big Stick-Base. It is as big as the throttle base but has no real use for that. You cannot get the stick between your legs when you want to use it as center stick and there are no official extensions for the stick. Also, the base is a bit light for keeping in position when using it on your desk and if you got both (throttle and stick) on your desk, you may not have any more space for stuff like keyboard.

But wasn't GB using the GR.1(A) and GR.3 in the Falklands war? As i can see this version never got an AA Radar. Just with the knowledge of that war, Royal Airforce began to put Radars into Harriers for Sea Harrier FA.2 in 1988, some years after the Falkland war?

I agree. Even though I cannot confirm about the first one because like I said my 10th gen has no e-cores

are you sure, it has to do with newer Intel CPU? I hear that in every thead. me myself use 10700k and had some shutterings in multiplayer and a friend of mine hast a Intel CPU that is many generations older than mine and we both had none of that problems before 2.9

Problematic is not the use of stable version in case of modules, harrier, Hornet, viggen are all my favourites on stable nor but the community server support is not as good as on beta. Most people want that fanc new stuff, so I know no one who uses stable, same as servers. All people I know play on beta server. Stable is something nice to have for singleplayer. plus, I am VR player and even with 4090 the performance on pre-DLSS was not shining.

Sorry, but I do not want to do all the workaround, I need ED to work all day as fast as they can to fix it. me and a friend stoped playing for the moment because it is unplayable for him. please ED.

I cannot agree with your thoughts on Meta Quest, because the headsets do as good with Meta as they did with Oculus (maybe even better. Today Hand tracking and app support are on a whole new level and I tell you by starting my VR life with Oculus DK2), just with the fact that there now is a big investor who pushes the success of VR with its own interests and this is good for the whole world of VR. But that is an other topic, quest 3 is the best you can buy for good money (because everything above is 200%-500% of the Q3 price) and is way better than G2 (my own experience given) in case of GPU: I used 3090 and now 4090. The 40th generation gives a huge performance boost, due to new driver Technologie that could not reached by 20th and 30th. So everything below 40XX is burned money because 3080 and 3090 is too expensive if you do not buy old used cards by people in the internet and everything below 3080 is not good for DCS (I tried 2070 and 3070 myself and it was terrible bad compared to what 3090+ gave me). Since the 4070 is nearly the raw performance of 3080 and has lower price, I would go with that or higher.

What cable issue? you mean the fact that there was some kind of problem with AMD Grafic cards, so everyone got a new cable for free that works fine? my G2 never had any problems with the cable and works like on day one

The 10700k is not the problem. I got the same one in standard configuration. I had the 3090 and upgraded it to 4090 not because it ran bad, more or less Luxus problems. Yes, the performance is way better with 4090 but It would be far to say that the 3090 did not work. With DLSS it should work fine. i would point out the headset because you need to much supersampling to compensate the low pixeldensity. back than I Switched from Quest1 to quest 2 (lend by a friend to test) and instantly had better performance because of the higher native resolution. As a result, I switched to HP Reverb G2 and again the performance per resolution/clarity rises. so either you get yourself a cheap G2 die to people selling them with the upcoming Q3 and keep your Q2 for good old VR only games that need good controllertracking (the G2 is terrible in controller tracking) or you directly switch to the Q3 and get the best out of ~600€ you can get at the moment. since I have the G2 and Q3, I would prefer the Q3 but at the moment, the prices of used but good G2 headsets should drop now. Maybe ask someone here in the Q3 Threads if he wants to sell his old one. a new CPU will bring the least performance and will cost the most (price/performance) because you need a new socket and may want to upgrade RAM, too. new GPU will be the most expensive but won’t bring quality of life due to the low resolution per eye on Quest 2

Because I do not think that your question was directly answered: Don’t worry! I came from G2 and got to Q3. I had problems first that got fixed by setting it up correctly with the Help of Dogmanbird and others here in the Thead and now the visual are almost clear and not just a sweetspot but most of the FOV is nearly as shape as the tiny sweetspot on the G2. Most of MFD visual clearness got lost by DLSS since 2.9 and with this better performance I have to lean in a little on both devices to not have the ghosting but it is just the ghosting that annoys, otherwise it would be clear. I never tested in F16 just in F/A18 and AV8B. Since you sit closer to the MFDs in F16 you may have even better view in Q3 because the FOV is wider and you not have to turn your head. I am all in all surprised by the Q3, I won’t go back to my G2. I just keep the G2 in case my girlfriend wants to play beatsaber in the same time, I want to play DCS because the G2 still is a good headset. Just not as good as the new Q3. Behind my meta account there is an extra Facebook account linked and I think this link is needed. But since this account is separate and I have no contacts or information in there, it is the same as if you need a PICO/Steam/Pimax account