Jump to content

Invisibull

Members
  • Posts

    630
  • Joined

  • Last visited

2 Followers

Personal Information

  • Location
    NYC

Recent Profile Visitors

22006 profile views
  1. My apologies. I'm sure you're not common.
  2. I'm just curious @-Rudel-, has the decision been made to keep the whistling effect as is or have the devs just not gotten around to fixing or at least looking into it yet? Thx.
  3. The link you provided is a legitimate webpage hosted by ibiblio.org, a well-known digital library and archive run by the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. The site is a reputable source for historical documents, particularly those related to military history. Great find! Edit: This link confirms authenticity - https://catalog.archives.gov/id/78294169
  4. Looks great! Thx for your efforts.
  5. The current implementation of the "enable water injection" key command does not affect MAP. At 1,000 feet and full throttle, MAP remains at 57", regardless of whether the key command is activated.
  6. Thanks, never used that one before.
  7. Go into F2 view and you'll see exact RPM and speed. I have it mapped for when I do tests like this that need exact values.
  8. The key command is currently acting as the throttle detent's micro-switch. The broken wire graphic suggests this is a temporary implementation. I don't think "some guys" are getting extra knots - either everyone is, or no one is. Would be nice if M3 weighed in and explained what we're all seeing.
  9. Yes, I do see an increase in speed. The issue is that the increase in power should be primarily the result of the expected increase in manifold pressure, which doesn't happen. It stays the same whether I "enable" the ADI system or not. Aside from the MP, all the other values are pretty much dead on. null
  10. Are you referring to "Enable Water Injection"? If so, I have verified the mapping and when I press it, the manifold pressure doesn't change. That's not to say it's not working, just that that keystroke does nothing. From the real flight handbook:
  11. Yes, it might be implemented, but without the wire or need to activate the water injection - it's still def a WIP The button press changes nothing, so it seems to not be implemented yet. As said in another post, the lack of a wire to inhibit travel of the throttle makes it pretty obvious that it's still a WIP.
  12. I get 57" and about 302 kts at sea level at the weight of 12088 lbs. As far as I can tell, there's no water injection implemented yet.
  13. Here's what you should be seeing at sea level with the parameters listed in the doc below - 358 mph / 1.150779 mph/kn ≈ 311.10 knots. Best I could get was about 302 knts. The disparity is even more pronounced at 19,900 as I stated above. Edit: Just noticed that the empty weight for our Corsair is listed as 9903. Maybe that's where the missing 9 knts are going?
  14. You're welcome. Hope it's worth the effort for you. lol
  15. OK, I put it in a notepad file, then back into the forum - it should be as plain text as plain text gets. Again, sorry for the hassle. Check again please.
×
×
  • Create New...