My_Name_Jeff

I am too lazy to find the track, but the problem with opening higher, is that it still fly toward the target straight, with the only difference of opening earlier, basically more off than before.

I want hmd NOW!

Is uboat on break or something, he's not really responding to anything

Nope, doesn't work;

Really? I'll test it out right at this session, it's been too long since I last used gb6. @uboats So when can this be fixed? as gb-6 sfw is pretty much our primary a/g weapon for jeff players.

GB_6_3.trk My observation is It's heading to the marked point as if it thinks it's gb-6 HE not sfw. Either that or something changed in terms of launching procedure, if so please point me out. @uboats

Copy thank you

As in if I shut down the plane without turning off the zeroizer I zeroize my plane?

Before I say anything I know the datalink is broken this thread is not that. I am not sure if this is my issue or a bug so I'm putting it here for confirmation, if yes I'll move it to bug and report. The problem is datalink won't turn on after a repair, as in NE- won't go to NES.

So it be. I laughed at a f18 for it missing all of his 154 last week, how the table turned on me.

Well of course, but I was hoping earlier since you know these weapons are pretty important to us.

And according to wiki, sd10b has better anti jamming capability. Curious as to how that will be simulated in dcs. Or that's already simulated I just don't know.

The Pakistan defense forum did mentioned the b varient and according to them the Jeff is using it in their af, but not sure which block since the block we got is 1 2ish block, that will probably determine whether we get it or not. Yes the guidence is much better at least counting from 2.9 I can tell, do keep in mind I mainly play pve and I've heard some issue with ai so my experience may vary. And it's not that range is a big issue on my end, Im just curious as the update log is very broad mentioning change to speed, flight profile and range, I can't get a full grasp on the exact capability of missile and exactly what changed from those words.

true, the sd10 started to perform funny when the datalink was broken. So I kind of had a suspicion that was the case.

And another question, does sd10 take any info from datalink or anything on that sort. For example if connected to datalink thr missile's recapture time is lower or anything like that in dcs?

Ok so that would be rmax though not actual performance range. And agree on the rest..

I don't think datalink was fixed at least according to uboat

As in are you suggesting that the drag profile might have changed so that it effected the range? Can't be the new flight profile as far as my observation it's really smooth.

Oh right, that was a stupid question I completely forgot about that

The system suggested max definitely changed at least from the info given on hsd. As far as the calculated rmax I can't really say since I don't have a on hand range test from the previous patch that I can reenact with current profile. As far as for update log, I think only mach change was clearly stated and new flight model which is very interesting in a good way. Can you elaborate on the test you conducted and what you compared it with to get the conclusion?

Appearantly deka is informed and is already fixed internally, but still don't know what exact time it will be fixed.

I am encountering issue of datalink info such as height being covered by the radar signal of the hostile aircraft, can't read the height basically, anyway to get around this?

So can I understand it as only the system suggested max range has changed.

And yes agree on the rest

Don't know what to comment but it sounds like simply an unformal interview, but on the other hand, this is one of the best public info we can get.