SemperFi

More realism = better simulator

I like to use combined arms, but tanks are too strong there. ATGMs like TOW and Konkurs are needed as static weapons in the game.

I think it's a good idea to have it as an optional feature. But correctly determining the likely failure rate of each weapon is difficult.

Ka27 + anti-submarine warfare

The SU17M4 would be the perfect aircraft for DCS. Very fast, good avionics, and capable of carrying powerful weapons, such as the KH29T, KH59 cruise missile, and KH58 anti-radar missile. But there's no official confirmation, is there? The mig23ml/a/d is needed so that the F4 and F1 have an equal opponent.

Thank you. I've been using the Mi24P since its release. I understand that I need the correct angle. Perhaps the error is in my DCS files.

Can you please check this again on my mission? If it works for you, the error must be mine. petrovich.miz

Thanks for checking. This issue has been around for a while, but even the latest DCS version couldn't fix it.

I have an example of the Germany map here. I used it because it's easy to reproduce. It's an urban area, but the error sometimes occurs in other areas as well. I've tried it several times, and the result was the same. I hope this can help.

I have the same problem. Petrovich only sees some targets, but he can't find others without cover. I have this problem on several maps, and now the MI24 is only playable with a human gunner.

Historically, the ML/MLA would probably be better for countering the F4 and F1. I'd even want to use the MLD to fight against a 4th-generation jet.

Don't forget the mi8

If that's true, that would be great. Do you have official confirmation from a developer?

Magnitude 3 also made a hint and I know about the projects from Octopus-G and SVKSniper but they aren't official, are they? Otherwise an FC3 Mig27 would be great, that would shorten the waiting time.

But SVKSniper project that will just be a mod right?