SemperFi

Thank you. I've been using the Mi24P since its release. I understand that I need the correct angle. Perhaps the error is in my DCS files.

Can you please check this again on my mission? If it works for you, the error must be mine. petrovich.miz

Thanks for checking. This issue has been around for a while, but even the latest DCS version couldn't fix it.

I have an example of the Germany map here. I used it because it's easy to reproduce. It's an urban area, but the error sometimes occurs in other areas as well. I've tried it several times, and the result was the same. I hope this can help.

I have the same problem. Petrovich only sees some targets, but he can't find others without cover. I have this problem on several maps, and now the MI24 is only playable with a human gunner.

Historically, the ML/MLA would probably be better for countering the F4 and F1. I'd even want to use the MLD to fight against a 4th-generation jet.

Don't forget the mi8

If that's true, that would be great. Do you have official confirmation from a developer?

Magnitude 3 also made a hint and I know about the projects from Octopus-G and SVKSniper but they aren't official, are they? Otherwise an FC3 Mig27 would be great, that would shorten the waiting time.

But SVKSniper project that will just be a mod right?

Hello, The imbalance between RedFor and BluFor jets is well known. Also, the ED doesn't have sufficient information or financial resources for full-fidelity variants of these jets. How about a Flaming Cliffs variant of the Su17/22M4 or MiG27M/K? They are fast and powerful fighter-bombers, capable of SEAD, and acceptable for air combat. Perfect for Cold War Germany

Combined Arms II? is this confirmed?

I think Combined Arms should evolve into an RTS-like wargame with a simple interface. That would be a great combination with the jets and helicopters.

A map of Germany without ground troops from the NVA and Bundeswehr would be incomplete. All those who own the asset pack get good quality, and those who don't get poor quality. That would be my suggestion.