szymixzmb

I am very happy with the current solution but if somebody wants an option I am fine with it if it's not changing the current one

We can already put "Not correct for DCS version" tag as we will have a version from around 2015 but in general the idea to integrate more drones into DCS would be great.

Haha, okay, that's insane, my bad. I have seen K239 Chunmoo few times so I had to connect it in my mind. Sorry for the trouble

Uhm, okay. If I can give my voice, I would prefer it how it is in real life, it would be nice if ATACMS looks like ATACMS. I would be grateful if you reconsider it My guess is that you did it that way because we can't have two types of missiles in one launcher currently (however reloading procedure and ability to choose would be freaking awesome, maybe one day) so in bigger scenarios it may make sense as it can be any within 10 minutes.

That's actually before launch. Even in a preview it does not display with ATACMS missile, it displays 6 GMLRS rockets.

It's probably a known issue to you but wanted to report as it wasn't fixed in today's patch.

I noticed similar problem but in later missions. That's very weird even with RTX 5090 and 9800X3D I cannot reach these 75 FPS on some missions at the end of the campaign. I remember when I was creating a mission myself and with even nearly empty map some combination caused the FPS to drop significantly so that's rather a DCS bug.

I also had this issue few times (I tried to complete it maybe 15 times). I am nearly sure it's because the trigger zone is closer than the waypoint itself so if you have set 12:24:00 on CRUS page you are reaching it earlier

That's the module I am expecting the most. I thought that I will never get but the best option is that we forget about it for 2 years and they will release it without any prior teaser.

@WHOGX5 I want F16 in the best possible state so feel free to write a report but if you want to change the way of working you need to attach this real world manual. It would be much easier then to convince ED

What I mean that some people here thinks that the quality of the image of the sniper does not take to the account that the videos (reference material) is compressed

Exactly, if we want to change something we need to provide reference material

What we need now is the comparison of real life sniper image without compression otherwise that's an endless discussion. ED will not change something because "we think". From my perspective the DCS image compared to the compressed video is better so probably a little bit adjusted for compression but @Nedum states that it should be much better. Probably the last image I posted is this most real we can get image but it is only from 4.9 NM. However it shows that there is not so much difference between TV and IR cameras in real life. In DCS PIP shows bigger difference.

@NineLine In the attachment there is the same for Kola map. As you can see in the track, that is not only the issue for taxiways and runways bur in general all objects have this weird "flickering" effect. Also in the track I managed to catch the example where XR does not fix all of taxiways , just some of them. First time I noticed it on Persian Gulf so there is high probability that it is for all maps. dcs.log tgp-kola.trk

I think only the original image can tell us the truth. If only somebody has it