ASW

don't know how difficult this is, but there is a suggestion for developers to make an optional SPO. As an INS for the KA-50 III. Some people are interested in flying and making corrections, while others have GPS in their car phone. 1. The version as it was conceived in the USSR 2. The version of how it really happened. This will balance the dogfight multiplayer, which will indicate which version is being used. Those who are interested in flying with the version that was in real life will use it. DCS will kill two birds with one stone in this way, disputes will subside and sales may increase.

I don't know how difficult this is, but there is a suggestion for developers to make an optional SPO. As an INS for the KA-50 III. Some people are interested in flying and making corrections, while others have GPS in their car phone. 1. The version as it was conceived in the USSR 2. The version of how it really happened. This will balance the dogfight multiplayer, which will indicate which version is being used. Those who are interested in flying with the version that was in real life will use it. DCS will kill two birds with one stone in this way, disputes will subside and sales may increase.

This is a document. As an aviation engineer I know told me, such documents are written in order to cover your ass with them if necessary. Therefore, the Russian word "maybe" in this document means to me that this thing will most likely not save me and I was warned about it.

It's not off-topic. I was just reading a Russian forum on this issue and came across an interesting document. I am translating to you what is highlighted in yellow, but in the translation version it sounds softer. than if you correctly convey the meaning in Russian using obscene expressions.) "When switching on the radar for radiation, it is not possible to use information from the SPO-15LM indicator due to its inaccuracy, and in some cases, its randomness." It shows errors and chaos occurs on the device!

It is your right to assume that electronics in the USSR were at the level or not worse than Western ones, but the incidents that have occurred with A-50 aircraft in the recent past incline me to trust the DCS developers.

I'm in the photo on the left, 20 years ago.

There may be an incorrect translation.) I wrote that it's better to attack on the move, even at low speed, and you told me that you fly a Gazelle in bad weather with suspended gas tanks...(external fuel tank) I'm trying to use simple words and sentences so that it's not difficult for a translator.

I created a mission at the Magdeburg training ground. You can try it. IInitially, there is no one at the training ground. You activate what you want via the F-10 radio menu. You can choose not to activate the radio menu and calmly destroy only the Roadblock. I recommend activating Blue Platoon, Red Platoon and waiting for the battle to develop. The enemies will be distracted and it will be easier to attack them. You will get a picture of the fight, just like in the movies. You can take a Mistral and launch four Mig-21s through the F-10. They can be activated via the radio menu at any time and they will fly to the training ground. Two JTACs, our own and the enemy's Mi-8, are working on the training ground. They will mark the targets with white smoke. Point 1 on NADIR is an enemy Roadblock, point 2 is your Base. You can listen to local FM radio on channel 31. null Magdeburg Training Ground SA342 REL .miz

You might as well ask a fisherman what size fish he caught.)

You can maneuver while moving, but when you're hovering, you're a target. The sight memorizes the target's position from a very long distance and rotates 120 degrees left and right. You can fly, using any cover, and then, at a range of 4,000 meters, emerge and launch a missile. The target range is visible on the NADIR.

There is no balance in real life either. Compare the navigation systems of the Boeing-727 and Tu-154. The Boeing has an inertial navigation system, and the Tu-154 has an NVU. For those who don't know, it's very similar to the Mi-8 navigation system, only with a correction from the RSBN. But in real life, according to those who flew, it was not used automatically. They were afraid that the plane would turn over. In the early 2000s, the KLN-90 GPS was no longer certified in Russia. It was installed on the Tu-154 and flew on it, turning it manually with a special handle.

I have a regular Sitek joystick with a twist. There are no pedals.)

I'm reading this topic with great interest. I'm well versed in Soviet civil aviation, especially navigation systems, but I'm not an expert on military aviation. The MiG-29 was my dream plane since the mid-1990s, and I even bought a SEGA just for it. As for the level of electronics in the USSR, I got a color TV in the early 1990s. Nowadays, due to sanctions, Russian-made cars don't have ABS, automatic transmissions, or airbags. They don't even have electric windows. Therefore, I trust the DCS developers. You have to fly, enjoy, and learn how to use what you have.

На днях зашел в онлайн и удивился, что у меня 16-30 фпс. Поставил новые дрова и снова стало 75 фпс. Но, когда я летом поставил новые дрова, при определенном освещении и погоде у меня дергалась кабина. Причем, только на карте Германии.

Я удалил конфиг SnapViews . Игра создала новый и все.