Jump to content

JunMcKill

Members
  • Posts

    1082
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by JunMcKill

  1. 23 minutes ago, okopanja said:

    Just for the sake of the clarity: there are 9.12 airframes capable of carrying R-77, after certain upgrades. However these upgrades are not part of the current scope. Maybe in future, who knows...

    The MIG-29SMT is the upgrade package for both original airframes and can carry R-77, quote from Wiki:

    "The MiG-29SMT version is an upgrade package for the first generation MiG-29 (9.12 to 9.13) containing many of the improvements developed for the MiG-29M. Additional tanks included in a larger dorsal hump provide a maximum range of 2,100 km (without external tanks). The cockpit features improved HOTAS-type controls, two 152 × 203 mm color LCD multifunction displays and two smaller monochrome LCD displays. The upgraded Zhuk-ME radar offers similar characteristics to the MiG-29M. The engines are upgraded to the RD-33 Series 3 that offer an afterburning thrust of 8,300 kgf (81.4 kN) each. The weapons load is increased to 4,500 kg on six underwing pylons and one central pylon, with armament options similar to the MiG-29M variant. This update is also focused on accepting avionics and weapons of non-Russian origin."

  2. On 2/18/2024 at 10:03 AM, Кош said:

    It's not hard to recreate what GCI computer does. But what GCI human should do gets me wondering too.

    The Cuban radar operators in Angola were very good, in fact the engagement in which a couple of MIG-23s managed to hit a South African Mirage F1 with an R-60 and the other escaped unharmed, according to the cuban pilot himself, the support of the Radar control personnel was decisive for said encounter.

  3. On 1/17/2024 at 12:04 PM, apolloace said:

     

    Interesting Video. 😀

    This is another kind of beast, ++++ far from the MIG-29A. Smokeless engines, extended flight range with more fuel, MFCDs with datalink and air to ground capability, R-77 and another new weapons, a new radar, air to air refueling. Ufff. Is like the SMT, the K or the Peruvian SMP

    • Like 4
  4. 3 hours ago, FlankerKiller said:

    We will see. The FM is in a good place I think. But systems modeling takes time. They aren’t stupid they will reuse what they can but it’s a long way from FC3 to full fidelity. If it wasn’t we wouldn’t care. I’m interested to see if this comes before the Flogger. I hope not. I think that might really hurt Razbam. I’ll be buying both on day one of pre order. But I’m an aviation nerd that loves Soviet aircraft. 

    If ED waits for RAZBAM's MIG23 we will never see the MIG29 this year, those guys have been in the project for years and are far to deliver.

    Anyway I will buy both models, but I have hope in ED to deliver this year. Everything of the actual FC3's MIG29A can be reused, why not? the cockpit is ok, only needs to change a few things, the PFM is ok, the ordnance is the same. The only real changes are in the avionics model, some HUD elements are different and that's all. For example, the SPO-15 RWR functions are different than the actual FC3 russian RWR, I hope they simulate the real one like the MIG-29 9.12 manual.

     

    By the way, the SU-27S manual is online too, and the US airforce have been using them as redfor for tears. Time to release that one too!.

     

  5. Synonyms for Fast

    fast accelerated alacritous breakneck brisk
    celeritous expeditious fleet hasty hurried
    hustling lightning-quick nimble quick rapid
    responsive speedy swift

    Synonyms for Slow

    slow adagio andante behind creeping
    deliberate dilatory gradual laggard late
    leaden-footed leisurely slack slow-footed slow-going
    sluggardly sluggish snail-like static steady
    tardy tortoise-like 

    unhurried      

    Razbam's MIG-23

    (They will hate me! 🤣

    • Like 3
  6. On 3/12/2023 at 5:04 AM, ESA_maligno said:

    I have also asked them on twitter about the MiG23..., but it seems they don't answer...

     

    ___________________________

     

    Les he preguntado por twitter sobre el MiG23..., pero la callada por respuesta....

     

    Hay callada por todos lados, ese es un proyecto zombie, esta muerto, a veces se levanta a ver si alguien lo mira con asombro, y vuelve a tirarse al piso 😄

  7. On 3/8/2023 at 5:29 PM, Ala13_ManOWar said:

    That'd requiere to have paid in the hundreds or even thousands $ ahead of time while you have absolutely nothing or only the 3D model in the Encyclopaedia to be watched for years to come while still spending even more money in skins just in case it's released any day soon, and I don't know about you but I've already paid 0 for the moment 🤣🤣🤣 .

    zero $ on my side for SC, but if RAZBAM promise to release this year the 23 I'll pay in advance.

    • Like 4
  8. 18 hours ago, Avimimus said:

    I'm kind-of expecting both before 2024... of course, it is dangerous to expect things like that - so I wouldn't advise anyone else to do it. But I'm willing to risk 🙂

    MIg-23 will go out in 2023

    MIG-25 in 2025 

    31 ....

    57?!! I will be long time dead by that year 😄

    • Like 6
  9. 18 hours ago, OverStratos said:

    Your opinions are... interesting
    Why don´t you drop in our Discord server?
    it is the main place where we discuss modules and its characteristics

    Time dear OverStratos, at the most I have a minute to read how is going the development of your modules! and that's it, the last time I flew DCS was a month ago.

  10. I agree with all that you say, but I can't provide you with any reliable information of what I spoke with the pilots (former Angola pilots), please take a look at the former soviet union history and what happened to the Kursk submarine and many other mishaps.

    Is not me who says they covered up defects and test results, it is the protagonists themselves, the internet is full of their interviews.

    But please, this is just a technical conversation (and somehow regarding the history of the former USSR), it's not to warm things up 😄

     

×
×
  • Create New...