Jump to content

*Rage*

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    3380

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    2

 Content Type 

Posts posted by *Rage*

    6900XT vs. Reverb I

    in Virtual Reality

    Posted

    I got drastically better frametimes and smoothness going from a 6800xt to a 3080ti. Frametimes dropped from 25-26ms to 17-18ms in my various DCS benchmarks. 

     

    Only downside is you get better (more visible) aircraft smoke/exhaust effects with AMD cards. 

    Motion reprojection not working (G2,3080ti)

    in Virtual Reality

    Posted

    Hi. I have a Reverb G2, Nvidia 3080ti, 8600K@5ghz.

     

    Im getting reasonable frames at 50-60fps with frametimes ~17-18ms. Id like to force reprojection on to get a stable 45 but no matter what option I choose in the application specific settings for DCS in Steam VR the FPS is always fluctuating. Im using FPSVR to monitor. 

     

    Any Ideas?

    TACT 21-1: Tactical Air Combat Tournament

    in Tournaments & Events

    Posted · Edited by *Rage*

    Hey everyone

     

    The tournament is approaching rapidly and we’re nearing the first matches. I want to clarify a few things.

    We’ve now got several streamers on board that will live stream as many matches as possible. It’s recommended that you fly your match on the scheduled time in order for it to be streamed. Rescheduling is allowed, but should you decide to do that, it’s important to include the streamer in that process. The assigned streamer(s) for your match are listed in the streaming schedule on the ED post.

     

    Try to find a new time that suits both teams and the assigned streamer. Should the streamer be unavailable on the new time, you must still inform him and the TACT admins. And remember, joining the **Gamemaster** slots during the fight is prohibited and grounds for disqualification if done. Those slots are solely meant for the streamers/TACT Admin to use. When shot down please disconnect. 

     

    The elimination format and schedule has been posted to the ED thread: 

     

    https://forums.eagle.ru/topic/266077-tact-21-1-tactical-air-combat-tournament/?do=findComment&comment=4603072

     

    Several of you have brought up questions regarding the rule “Known DCS bugs and exploits must not be used to gain an advantage”. However, that does not mean *everything else* is allowed. The reason for the vague rule is that we cannot know everything in advance and should a clear, unsportsmanlike behavior be detected, it is grounds for disqualification. These things can be hard to define exactly but most of us recognize severe and deliberate exploitation when we see it. 

     

    **Due to the uneven modeling of ECM between modules, we’ve decided to prohibit the use of any ECM for TACT 21-1. Some modules are affected and some aren’t yet.**

     

    **Use of 16 or 32 second memory in the F/A-18 attack radar is prohibited**

     

    **Use of “target size - small” on the F-14 is prohibited**

     

    **We highly discourage you from launching Aim-54s in active mode BEYOND 10 nm; ACM Switch up / PH-ACT / PSTT lock or PAL, as these launches have been prone to desync**

     

    We recognize that there’s multiple accounts on the F-14 issues and realise that enforcing the above rules is difficult, especially with how fragile client tracks are. If there are instances of 54 desync it is likely you will forfeit that round.   

     

    We can provide servers for the match times listed. I will set them up and make them available to the teams that want to use them. Feel free to use your own servers as well, if it suits you better. 

    Вопросы к разработчикам

    in DCS World

    Posted

    1 hour ago, FoxAlfa said:

    Can we get a server option for Combined Arms to turn-off Missile visibility in F10?

    CA is often used for GCI in many servers, but ability to see missiles ruins the immersion.

     

    PS Variably / Setable refresh rate would be nice too, but I can image that is too much to ask. 

    +1

    • Like 1

    DCS MiG-29A

    in DCS: MiG-29A Fulcrum

    Posted

    28 minutes ago, Dudikoff said:

     

    Balance is not the main reason when asking for older F-16/18 variants. Some people would enjoy late Cold War scenarios where the airplanes were not that multi-role (so, single-role aircraft still existed), the weapons were less smart and missions were probably more adrenaline inducing.

     

    Thus, IMHO, it would be great if ED would offer some older variants of Falcon and/or Hornet (kind of like A-10C II or the now defunct Ka-50 BS3).

     

    I agree. I love the 3rd gen cold war stuff. 

     

    I'm just saying between a block 15 and block 50 or a Su27s and a Su35s I know which is the more appealing to the greater audience and ergo the development time. 

     

    I'm under no doubt that if, if, ED could model a Mig35 over a Mig29A they absolutely would. 

    DCS MiG-29A

    in DCS: MiG-29A Fulcrum

    Posted

    Just now, Max1mus said:

     

    Because the effort is lower, and it would be done shortly after release. They can then make more modules and make more money.

    You had better fly over and present this epic business plan. 

    DCS MiG-29A

    in DCS: MiG-29A Fulcrum

    Posted · Edited by *Rage*

    Why would ED make a less modern F18/F16 when they know a later block would sell much more? Do the developers not like paying off their mortgage or putting theirs kids through college?

     

    Imagine if somehow they could do a FF Su35s/Su30SM, would you still be clammering for an original Su27/Su30? No.  

×
×
  • Create New...