SESova

Maby to thry Saitek cyborg EVO.It has an interesting part for hand space limitation on the butom of the stick.It is removable and customizable for left and right hand people,and customizable up and down.

Yes,lol.Some people thrying to looks imortant.

To understand this tracks,i sugest to start the track and turn on tacwiev program in background.Afther watching tacwiev klip,you will understand what is all abouth.If you dont have it,dowload it,it is free.But dont forget to turn it off afther,becouse you wont bee able to enter on the servers.Other way you wont understand this tracks..Pay attention when red side plane making 90 angle with incoming aim 120B.That is the most important part.

Found the answers.A friend has help me.

No replay from knowledgeable moderators.No even almighty F-15 heroes of the sky. There is one more error in FC 2.0.Still not fixed. Last night i flew with my friend,i shot him,he shoot me.There was messagë: "Building has killed =SE=Sova by SU 27" Maby now i have attention.

Hi guys. Can somebody tell me wich one file in lock on doing integrity check? I create the server and others cant join becouse i use MiG 21BiS mod.I want to find that file wich doing intehrity check and do specific set up,that people with out instaled MiG 21BiS mod can enter on my server.

Thats right,Atkara.Now everything works fine.Thanks,very much. This kind of people shud work for ED and do Flaming cliffs,not these fog salers,and thair helpers,"heros" of the sky in F15....

On the GI people form 51-st using ATC with FC 2.Is there some other program than Lotatc?

Hi guys. I am thrying to using Lotatc for FC 2,but when i start server Lotatc it reports error,FC does not duing export....and provide solution,as in instruction manual is asked. I allready did all,but it still does not working. Here are 3 screen shots.Am i missing enything? http://www.mediafire.com/?wgf1qe3w1i8w1ew http://www.mediafire.com/?aaj23y32nr43tgt http://www.mediafire.com/?pvx4kkli7maugka From some reson,i cant put pictures on the post.Please clik on the link,and chose open or dowload.

Why there is no voting for russian planes?That mean new DCS is going to be american fighter?

Thats also good proposition,if is possible to get informations abouth that plane and weapons.

When Eurofighter was finished,it was much wors than MiG 29,so every country continue with his development.I think,still is not over.

I agree with you.But,su 25 have no anti radar missiles and other precision weapons,and as resoult,it migth happend that many people found that game is not interesting and vould not by that game.I dont know,maby i am wrong. I vould like MiG 21,Fantom F 4 + Su 25 DCS game.Something like that,back at 60-70-ties.But i dont know is that so much interesting for other people. Maby su 34?It is new plane,still secret.Is it possible to collect informations abouth flights capabilty to create flight model,weapons?

Su 25T Hi I want to suggest new DCS and i vould like to be Su 25T. If must to be figter,i chose Su 27.

What error with R 27ET at FC 1.12? We where able to owerride that missile and hit targets even at 30km distance.In that time,you,ED did clame it is OK.In FC 2.0,thats not possible.Not even its not possible,then its FAR from R27ET missle from FC 1.12.What is the true,the things you said before,or now? A lots of players did fly Russian planes at FC 1.12 becouse R 27ET missile.Now the flyining F 15 becouse AIM 120C.Group of gamers who serching bugs and errors in the games and using them to become aces of the sky. I did provide provide proff,the video where I,flying SU 27,needed 5 missiles to destroy F15.One missile has missed non-manuvering F 15:megalol:,pass pretty close.But,game of deaf phones started. You said,oh thats not terrible,all planes have that problem...Now you say everything is OK.YOU give Me now the proof.Give me the track from server of the 51 sqd. where an F 15 needed 5 AIM-120C missiles,4 hits to destroy an su 27.Than i am going to belive you.You wont to enter on the server,becouse you know what is going to happend. Yea,eny kid can land fighter plane with no problem.Many real fihter pilots play this game and you have to acept thair comments. I know you did spend a LOT of hours on the FC 2.We all see that.Its pretty good game.But,who works,he made mistakes,nothing terible.Humans make mistakes.But,thay have to fix them,specialy if take the money for the product. There is no much to fix at FC,it would be greate game,soo cant see why not.I am shure it will bring money.Quality always find buyers. No more posts from me on this subject.My english is not so good and its not so important to force my self to using dictionary....You will do what you attend enyway. You will see afther relise FC3 what i and hundred the others was talking abouth. Best wishes.

Good job Case,i like it. Specialy number of fired AIM 120C,lol.

Simply,enter on the server of the 51-sqd and fight agains your dear F15,and you will see. Have you notice how easy is to land the plane at FC? FC 1.12 had error with R27ET missile.FC 2.0 has with F 15.I think its not hard to fix.You did great youb with FC,but same as windows.Its good,but have some small bugs,the ones wich the most unnerves you.God game,good job with ground units,excelent mission editor,but please,FINISH THE GAME! Some small pyisics push to the reality would satesfide everbody,and you dont lose players.Still wont be high realism,but it will be good start.

If I fly 1000 km/h,and can make turn in 180 degrese inside 1-2 km and 3 seconds,keeping that speed,thats not good flight simulation.

Yes.DCS is fine begining of new era of combat flight simulations.And DCS of ww2 figter is nice move.In the same time you offer high % of realism + profit for development others DCS,les profitable.BUT,are you going to be so good to take over IL-2 players? I hoppe you will. BUT,again,as you said you have to stay in the bussines.Thats true,and that something what we,combat fligt simulations lovers hate to hear. As you said,we have to wait.I am now 35 years old.Hoppe in 50-ties will have chanse to by good flight combat simulation. Maby to collect donations and organize an non-profitable company to create good flight simulation?:pilotfly:

The problem is that games are not done for the military air force lovers. Producers doing games for the "gamers".The people who playing games for fun.Thay play it for some time,and than chose some other game.That is 50% castumers of all games.Thay want instant fun.If producer do high % of realism and thay have to spend few months to learn how to fly,thay want by that kind of game. Next 50% players is consisted of 5% true military airfoce lovers who bying games like this and want high % of realism,and 45% others why more-les like military air foce and play for some time,using pirates versions,and interested for finding bugs in the game,to use them to become aces of the sky. With so small market,and such small comunity,we maby never get the combat flight simulation with high % of realism.We can only hoppe that some important parts of the game will be done good,and we can focus on it to create some kine realistic environment. Said,but true.

No,not right now.First i am going to check a lots of things.I wont thrust enymore to ED like before i bougth FC 2.0. If is just cosmetic changes of FC 2.0,my answer is NO.Thay have to do a LOT on the planes flight model,missiles....

First time hear that.

Four missile needed,missile no.4 missed the non-manuvering target.Its too much. Picture says everything.