Jump to content

LFCChameleon_Silk

Members
  • Posts

    356
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Everything posted by LFCChameleon_Silk

  1. I'd try it out but I don't really fly the A-10 much
  2. i am wanting to have a big game of it tonight, but i only know a handful of ppls, add me on steam if you have steam my addy is Chameleon_Silk
  3. on further playtesting primary tasks are not completing will have this issue fixed ASAP, i know how to do it, and all other tasks are working perfectly.
  4. sounds like a video card issue, could also be driver related - have you reinstalled video drivers recently.. is it possible the drivers overlapped and aren't playing nicely?
  5. disabling swap file is a bad idea even on massive ram systems, windows was always designed to page some information when you take that away it can cause problems, having said that it could be an unrelated problem. some programs such as adobe photoshop wont even work without a swapfile, they need to store all those undo's somewhere. If i could i would tear out anybodys eyeballs who thinks disabling pagefile is a good idea this is like A+ software 101. I'm also on 16gb ram and DCS always uses 3999 mb or my ram. system hard locks are most definetly that overclock or some component being stressed to far, I don't care what your stability testing has found out, your wrong, put stock clocks on everything and if your hardware isn't already damaged and provided there is no registry or driver acting up the game should not hard lock ever... it really stinks of a RAM or VRAM issue. are the ram identical pairs? have you overclocked your VRAM recently?
  6. tell them to hold position and then kill the air defenses yourself, then tell them to proceed and they do much better, also consider giving them kh-25mls and SEAD missiles and utilize them that way.
  7. Name: Operation Perched Eagle 1630, Version 2.16 for DCS 1.2.8 Author: =LFC=Chameleon_Silk Mission type: SP/MP/Training Controllable: A-10C/A-10A/Ka-50/Su-25/Su-25T/MiG-29S/Su-27/F-15C/Ka50/Mi-8MTV2/UH-1H/Full Combined Arms Support Quick Summary: - Unlimited tasks using a custom made script that includes a reward system. - PVP or COOP game play. - Must know how to use your bullseye to locate targets. - Intended for ground attack with some light CAP flights, mission is controlled by ground task successes -- so in short don't fly air superiority if the enemy team has no ground attack going on, there will be nothing for you to shoot. [url=http://www.digitalcombatsimulator.com/upload/iblock/137/OPE_Version_2_16.miz][/url] Link/Download: http://www.digitalcombatsimulator.com/upload/iblock/137/OPE_Version_2_16.miz MIRROR: http://speedy.sh/JCTDS/OPE-Version-2-16.miz Full brief/Discussion thread: http://forums.eagle.ru/showthread.php?t=123615
  8. yet another update, 2.06 fixes all known issues, i verified that rewards work and the tasks start correctly, I added 15 minute interleave between a new task starting so that way people can vacate the area before having new units spawn in (potentially underneath them) this was a request from a user and think it will make it much better for any KA-50's and just generally more playable. I played this all day and had 0 problems, so finally its solid and this time I really mean it, have fun :pilotfly: and if you run it on your server let me know so i can come join yas sometime!
  9. yes for the moment being sorcer3r, i will need helo specific tasks for them to a viable option. I know people want them and maybe in future i will be able to add something for them but atm they are low priority... till 2.05B (just released) the task maker was broken more then working... try 2.05B all other versions are garbage now... as I finally fixed the unresolved issues.
  10. updated the bad download link, sorry for the issues with the download again... if anyone gets a task that does not start or give the information for please report to me here or through PM and i will try and revise the script to remove this inability to proceed.
  11. 2.02B updated, this version has a lot of work done on it, suggest anyone who has downloaded it previously try the latest, you won't be disappointed :joystick:
  12. version 2.0 has been finished, completley reworked!
  13. 1.08 released to fix some issues with 1.07B no more broken tasks, some new tasks... this one should be untouched for sometime. Just goes to show how immature version 1.00 really was I put so much work into this since I released it -- now its time to fly it! anyone who trie/s/d it please leave a message and let me know what you thought of it.
  14. Yea me to man, except I am even more hardcore and dislike even fog of war on, i have everything disabled and map only... but i have let the player / server decide what to set it as since I've released the map... in otherwords not locked it to any setting and it goes off player / server setting. You would never find a target using the cover picture so that point is not really a very good one, at any given time most those units aren't even present as there is over 100 secondary tasks and the frontline is never the same. Dynamic bullseye calls mean that you get new information from the task system when a target is moving using MIST 3.3 -- a mission developer library of sorts, its not hardcoded... nor does it use JTAC but you can request the BR at anytime using the menu. which is the only way you would find any targets if the mission was set to map only (which is the best way to play it) if your unsure of what a Bullseye reference point is its a pretty important tool that you can use to find targets. as for the download link I have fixed it... not really sure why everyone calls the tankovy the Toad, is that the NATO designation? the SU-25 family has many different variations, the T is know as the "tankovy" because of its anti-tank role and the "grach" or the "rook" the initial variant of the frogfoot.. it bothers me that no one realizes this, there is no SU-25A and they are both just variants of the same base aircraft the frogfoot.
  15. what exactly do you think a tankovy is. :pilotfly: also everyone i know has been playing this since feburary its been a long time comming to get it to this point, if you have feedback feel free to leave your opinions and remarks about it or things you would like to see added.
  16. 2.16 "SUPER ULTIMATE EDITION" :: Player slots ::: ::: Player slots ::: 4 * Su-25 "Tankovy" 12 * Su-25 "Grach" 4 * A-10C "Warthog" 4 * A-10A "Thunderbolt II" 1 * Su-27 "Flanker B" 1 * MiG-29S "Fulcrum" 2 * F-15C "Eagle" 4 * KA-50 "Black Shark" 2 * Mi-8MTV2 "Hip" 2 * UH-1H "Huey" 4 * Observer Slots 2 * Tactical Commander 2 * JTAC As Russia withdrew from South Ossetia due to political pressure Georgian and American forces launched a successful invasion of Abkhazia and are now looking to punch through the defenses on the north Georgian border and over run the town of Cherkessk. Operation Perched Eagle 1630 contains UNLIMITED tasks in a PVP or pure COOP battlescape. Use the radio (F10 sub menu) to view tasks for your coalition and complete them to earn rewards! sorry, still no troop transport implemented but will be included with the next update! DCS SITE DOWNLOAD: http://www.digitalcombatsimulator.com/upload/iblock/137/OPE_Version_2_16.miz MIRROR: http://speedy.sh/JCTDS/OPE-Version-2-16.miz
  17. Ok, obviously do want a flame war cause you can't leave it go. I already said it was not intended to be offensive, and no i will not change the name unless a moderator wants it changed (which i have not received any PM from a moderator nor any reprimand, and hopefully stays that way since it was not my intention) you all seem to think I'm sharing my hard work wanting some kind of rise, the name of the server is all in caps, so that is why my mission pack is all in caps, i mean go tell DRAGON to uncap his mission pack cause its obnoxious... exactly. man some people have a thin skin, personally i think I'd rather cry over some spilled milk, but hey thats my opinion.. thought I'd share since so many opinions are being flung on my thread that you keep derailing which is probably in the rulebook as well, I've also asked that it be left alone, do you see me reporting people for dragging it on... I've already said change the title if its that bad, If i have broken a rule then I am sorry for that as that was never my intention to actually offend anyone, I'm just trying to show you my missions, download at your own risk of warping your childish mind. also you have to look at it this way controversy sells and is why the brand is as popular as it is, yea we could use a name that is less edgy but we would have half the draw as we do now.... does the name attract immature players... no, my whole squadron is very mature and older guys. eminem used controversy to sell records and its no different then what i do with my missions (although actually unintended in this case) he also had the same stuff being slapped on him with what about the kids etc... do you really think any intelligent human being would really be warped by seeing the name of my mission pack? cmon, like i said before get real. get a dose of reality. stop living in a land of dragons and knights in shining armor. as for dissing my grammar, i have a grade 9 education and am 29, does that mean i don't know how to script or to make a mission, no it does not... that is far more of a personal attack then anything i have said in any of the posts I have made on DCS forums, but do you see me clicking report... no. Judging someone by their grammar is like judging a book by its cover and honestly when i come here to waste my time on lost souls to say my point of view i don't really care how well its typed up, some English teachers will write a letter that they will fuss over for a week before sending it, do you think i want to worry about something like that on something so trivial, once again get real, I'm a busy man. fact remains i have a hit counter i know how many have checked it out and i must say thanks for checking it out everyone, it definetly was downloaded far more then i could have ever imagined they would be, and the constant thread bumping is probably to blame... so if its really offensive just let it slide off the front page (where it is right now with me responding to it while its still bumped) so don't say i came to bump it when i did not. I am currently busy scripting in another game engine that for forum rules (most likley) will remain un-named that recently came out in alpha status. I still intend to do more missions for DCS world and when i do this thread will be re-bumped, renamed or not. thanks again to those who can look past something like this and once again i ask that if any mod reading this thinks that it truley is offensive to just rename it to =LFC=, please and thanks. now leave it alone, cause i don't want to keep addressing the same thing and beating the same dead horse, really ridiculous how immature the mature ones can turn out to be, i feel bad for your children to be honest, living in that jail cell of yours. "Your bad grammar and immature, petulant way of expressing yourself, combined with your thickheaded refusal to understand why people might find the title of your mission tasteless and foolish" where did i ever say that I did not understand why some would find it offensive, i have already addressed why its named the way it is and apoligized for the 1 pct of you that can't get your noggin around the name, petulant way of expressing yourself, excuse me? thats more offensive to me then any thread name will ever be maybe its you dude that is tone-deaf and taking my words the way you wish to perceive them, i do wish to fisticuff or combat anyone here, I have said time and time again that this is for my mission postings not for discussion of the packs name, if you want you can create a new thread to discuss the mission packs name, and risk adding more exposure to my brand. thanks.
  18. ok you i will refrain from personal attacks because thats obviously want you want out of me. you know for a mature bunch you guys are a bunch of hot headed individuals, whats the rating on the game, 4 and up? we're blowing up virtual peoples and your gonna tell me its acceptable to show that to your kids. Forum rules not withstanding you guys just like to hear yourselves talk, the world would be a better place if there weren't so many uptight individuals, and to masturbate is a natural thing that should not be as taboo as it is, ask any sex ed teacher and by you being so up tight about something that is perfectly OK and not vulgar in anyway shows your immaturity. A name is nothing without meaning, the conversation should have stopped about it when i said that's not what it means, I can name my server whatever i want to name my server, If i have to look at a server name using a black racial slur but you guys have your knickers in a knot over a tongue in cheek name, like get real... seriously stop being such lil' snots. if you don't want to check out my missions don't post in my thread, if you dislike the name go away and don't bother to bump it for more to see. you logic is failure, and if you scroll up I've already asked that if its that offensive for it to be renamed and/or adjusted to =LFC= as far as not wanting to check out a mission i designed based off the name you can get bent, leave me alone and stay out of my thread as I have already asked. pretty simple right, change name of the thread for the babies that can't stand to read something they disagree with cause they are clergymen and move on.. something i would like to do but you guys keep discussing a name with gutter minded thoughts. what kind of 12 year old comes on here and read wanker and starts using it offensively, you know you better put some ear muffs on your young one before he leaves the door, as well as a blind fold for the rest of the world. you logic is as stupid as when i got in trouble for having a group on yahoo named hardcore, see what if my younger brother went to school and said he seen hardcore on my pc. like think about it... for a mature bunch you seem like a bunch of squabblin lil brats to me.
  19. look here guy, its a brand name no more offensive then tommy hilfiger or nike, you can take what you like out of it but get your mind out the gutter since i'm not even going there... hes actually a really nice guy... i knew a guy who went by the nickname A hole, but it was actually that his name was a A hole, like in the ground or in a peice of loose leaf, if you called him the vile word he would flip out since that was not his intention nor what he wished to be known for. using your assumption Virginia is not a suitable name for a state and many map locations are completely immature! wankerpants woman frequents the teamspeak and she goes by pinksock, suppose you have something to say about that one as well, or how about my name Chameleon_Silk, maybe i mean silk undies and :helpsmilie: me if i were to live in Intercourse, Pennsylvania. like get real, if your half as mature as you say you are you wouldn't pick fights over a server name, I'm not the one naming my server racial slurs and i really hope that guy does get banned (as thats offensive and immoral). in short take your rainy cloud elsewhere i make missions and just offering to them the community i could easily just have not posted them here and quite frankly when i see how uptight people are all the time it makes me not want to frequent and mingle with other pilots. in the future I'll just name my pack =LFC= and be done with it, ANYWAYS thanks for the bump and thread hijack. if any mods find it that offensive for this "mature" community then feel free to censor it and add =LFC= as its not meant to be inflammatory in anyway which i already stated before and am quite tired of being harassed by englanders that have nothing better to do. If you don't have anything nice to say don't say anything at all, your comments about anything other then my mission files are inappropriate and unwelcome as that's not what this thread topic is about. I'd appreciate if you didn't bother responding back as your already pushing the boundaries for no reason other then to see your hot breath. EDIT: and btw wank and wanker are a surname in some parts of the world! you know what they say about assuming something.....
  20. updated version of Bitter Rivals to 1.10, this new version should address a lot of problems and balancing, I put a lot of work into this one to make sure it was as good as i possibly could make it. I also updated the DCS repository with a link to this forum post so that users can find the most up to date version instead of running a very old version, hopefully this is acceptable. =D happy flying. expect a new one soon that will build on this style of mission, in a different locale and with some more advanced waypointing. if the file is still saying 1_06 its because the person hosting it has yet to add it to the files, it should be there soon whenever i can get a hold of him... just kinda jumped the gun and thought he was around to add it.
  21. no way you could just have it hold, when triggered event occurs, remove the helicopter using group deactivate and then activate a second helicopter that would "resume" the mission because its waypointing would be the rest of what the first helicopter was supposed to do. a bit of trickery to get the right results. don't know if this would suite your needs.
  22. yea about the name i am just mirroring my friends teamspeak servers name, his name is wankerpants, despite what many may think the meaning is it does not mean this in anyway... we are actually quite mature gamers despite what the title would suggest, were friendly thats about the only similarity... he runs wankercraft.org a minecraft server and teamspeak, hes also my :pilotfly: and we :joystick: together on wankercraft.org. :doh::megalol: its just unfortunate that many people who are into flight sims are from europe where the word is considered much more offensive, cause overseas its a very uncommon thing. in other news i put up 1.06 of bitter rivals, its complete it works as intended and been having a blast with it, not many people come around though and when they do they don't even say hello and just leave! how unfair online gaming can be sometimes!
  23. while there is no hill in the mission i chose to say hamburger hill not because of your mission dragon (I actually haven't played any of yours yet, although i know you put a ton of work into yours) but because both teams are throwing each other at each other in a full frontal assault, perhaps there is a better term but it is not the first time i have seen a game mode similar to this described this way, I wonder if Hank would be proud if i called it king of the hill. :megalol: I will add the files to the DCS website repository but only after i am satisfied that i will not be making any more changes, i mean i added bitter rivals 1.03 and 1 day later i have made so many changes that 1.03 is antiquated already and its probably not even been okay'd yet to be placed on the repository (although tbh i didn't check yet) once i am confident that things are in a final state i will begin to add them, for now i will provide my own personal links to the files, for anyone concerned over safety feel free to open the .MIZ with winrar and look through the files, its not like these are executable!
  24. yes no problem the only issue is i have no other place to put the files, any ideas of a better site to host them at? I'm only using that one because after megaupload got taken out i hadn't found a suitable replacement. I will update my latest mission some critical bugs found in 1_03... not something i really want people to experience playing my mission for the first time :P EDIT: changed download links to split up the package and changed download location, best i can do for now.
  25. thanks a million guys, i'm really new at LUA scripting but did some scripting for arma 2 in the past so hoping to really get into the DCS scripts and make some really nice missions. will have to check out mist 2.0 when you release it for sure, hopefully things will get really documented out on the wiki over time. I will take a look at the sample mission sometime later on today, if it does what i think it does my missions will suddenly seem like the AI knows what its supposed to be defending :)
×
×
  • Create New...