Ragnarok

Thanks. It's corrected :thumbup:

I believe that there are old players who wished old LockON campain. I tried to do a good campaign for DCS, in order to be identical with the old campaign. For now it is only for Su-27. Enjoy! :thumbup: Link for downloading Su-27 campain - Remake LOMAC.rar

Yep, mistake. Difficulties in translation. Sorry Quick question, the game is simulated V1 or V2 radar?

I think A2A-SARH will slip if the yaw angle large, and if the distance is small for a small fraction of a second (without chaff), although I'm not sure whether the difference with pings between players in multyplay has an impact... It is difficult to say whether each situation is identical result. e.g. is not the same whether the ground effect as water and rocks (high effect), forests or arable land (low effect). I am understand software-gyroscopic memory, but this has limited under different conditions.

To get back on topic. I think that the problem is the ER is coded to currently lose guidance on a blind corner(3-9), there is not encoded latent period of a few seconds for these condition. Is not needed as much as five seconds like fighters radar. That is just a second or two, the problem to be solved. Large angle deflection in these conditions not allowed ER to return back to the target.

Maybe there is something. That are sensitive and hidden information data.

little off topic... within the DCS, SPO-15 shows the reality of just 4km altitude mutually, head on. In real live, if this shows two empty lamp 4km alt vs 4km alt (~40km for F-15, although radar improves), with a altitude difer. example 8km atitude vs. 2km altitude, and a big aspect, show five lights, also 40km. Modern RWR in Su-35/30 it is much more accurate, but SPO-15 is not. In DCS it is very simple.

I tried to explain the problem with drawing. I got the impression that you think that the technique guidance is complex. Not. It's very simple! Technology is focused on the removing disturbances. primarily ground effects, blind speed and blind corners, ECM, Chaff... The essence of guidance is very simple. Guidance SARH from Data Link provided only for long distance, but it is unstable. High probability that it will lose missile, and seeker from SARH never found a radar reflection. Look at the pictures that I drew. https://www.dropbox.com/s/n1r395tox8m3vum/picture%201.png https://www.dropbox.com/s/y9igr8xbdavqaw9/picture%202.png https://www.dropbox.com/s/axm14l6wiy1t0sp/picture%203.png

Moment of the launch gives changes the width of the radar beam. Semi active guidance depends on distance, not on the level of missile flight. For example, if you launch the 20km, semi active seeker catches the reflection from the target while still attached to the wing. When it launches, the radar beam is introduced into a wide beam, because missile could fall from the cone beam. With a wide beam, guidance is not accurate, and therefore later narrowed the radar beam, when missile in his path stabilized. There is one other thing that will surprise you here: SARH during their flight can be seen on the radar. Radar tracking missiles. There is also software timer for impact!

Not true. Serbian MiGs did not launch anything during the war. I know about the case. Serbian pilot was Abdul Ehmeti who unexpectedly locked the enemy fighter. He needed few seconds to launch, but the officer for guidance he had ordered an immediate return to base. Pilot was disappointed. In the air was the only one, and no more. During the war, at the same time take off a maximum of two fighter.

Has anything changed in the coding of 1.2.4 to 1.2.8?

Interesting! I tested chaparal, strela-1/10 and they all shoot in 3km. Аpparently all IR missiles launched at the same distance. All of one mother born... :doh:

I doubt the validity of your data. No one will give.

Engines are not the only heat source in an airplane. For example, the F-16 on the front edges of attack, the Mach 1, the temperature at the front edge of the 100 degrees celsius. MiG-25 to Mach 2.5 speed even over 400 degrees. Friction through the air produces enormous heat. Thermal cameras can record far less heat than 100. See your web cam, only change exposure you get an amazing filter for invisible reflections. What to say about IR cameras and military technology?!

It will be interesting to follow the logic of ED. For now, the more useful the stinger hook up, than the use the R-27ET. We'll see who will want to play the drone, the Russian aircraft. But I think that this is not final. Every patch delivers a complete turnaround. Nobody wants to fly what in reality does not exist. Ka-50 is brilliant! My recommendation to everyone...

I think that aspect is not modeled. Aspect 0/4, head on, non afterburn is about 10km. But now the aspect 1/4 front hemisphere with afterburn is 90-100km. This is obviously purpose given only the most important approximately information. The problem is that the 0/4 head on to the detection can be improved by increasing the angle of >15 degrees of target. Permission for R-27T/ET is too short. Thermal head catching hot leading edges of the aircraft, which are probably over 100 degrees of celsius. Can not be that weak. 3km is poor. My old phone Nokia 6131 has a better camera than ET. With it I caught J-22 Eagle about 1.5 miles from my house :smilewink: laser is not always the one that records speed and distance, already the software that differentiates modulated infrared wave, based on the steering angle in a specific aspect (russian "ракурс- front and rear 0/4, 4/4 like a 90deg. and 2/4-3/4 between these two") Anyway, EOS is a huge difference in their power, based on the situation. Sometimes reveal very much, sometimes too short! This definitely is not modeled for now! clipping from manual:

I do not know if someone already posted, I don't know if the bug or the new logic of ED's? Authorization for R-27T/ET and R-73 is about 3km in conditions without afterburn and front hemisphere, with afterburn about 10-12km. EOS detects target in front hemisphere about 14-15km afterburn and non-afterburn! What happens now? Why so much change? 1.2.8

Guys, do you have drop in FPS u1.2.8 with the same settings if 1.2.7?

Moon Phases Calendar Look at: 1 June 2011- 31 May 2012

Does anyone know how to solve this problem? Profiler for G940 only works when I do "alt + tab", get out of the background, and then go back to the DCS!

Full installation 1.2.7 is default. I bet it is a network problem.

I'm not 100 percent sure but I think there is a bug, client does not register that I was fired missiles. He seemed on his computer has no my missile, when I see my missile as it goes into space, does not follow the target. We have both external views, and a client except STT has no missile in the air. I dont know, whether it abundantly eject chaffs so that the server load, and fails to transmit specific information?

The simplest way to get knowledge is: you must to be a member of a good squadron!

https://www.dropbox.com/s/5lvazktarm5hl3c/dcs%202014-01-05%2002-06-13-09.mp4 my simple test for ER and R73 in high angle and close distance. I have to express my satisfaction with R-73 and expected behavior heavy ER in high angle. Nice for now! Countermeasure against AIM120C also very good! :thumbup: