Ragnarok

right. Russia no ER, the highlight of their A2A is R-27R. They make ICBM, S-400, IRBIS-E, Proton-M, submarines, Saturn AL-31, OLS and FLIRs, but they do not know how to make ER or something better. Su-35 and in it the pinnacle of technology the Russian army big R-27R, the icing on the cake. R-27R, the pillar of this mighty fighter. :thumbup:

Lucky for me that the coming months I'm crazy busy, and happiness for me is that developers do not read our posts, otherwise I would have spent my life on the forum. Guys, my advice is not to try to explain the logic in hopes the "tallest" hear. They do not listen much even those who have a reputation in the aviation world, let alone us. But to educate each other is ok. @Rage you know what to test, so if there are changes, you will inform me! :thumbup: tnx guys. you know if one of your missing something, It also missing and thousands of others who do not write.

the problem would be solved when to BVR mode SARH behaved like in DCS1.2, and in close mode like now in 1.5. Not the happiest but much better than now. ... and + DTL between two Su-27 in MP like in SP :)

What do you think the emergence HOTAS was accompanied by an eruption of of delight? :)

yes. this "little time" sometimes never comes. and it is not necessary. Many things are more important to tactics and the logic of it. If you want the X factor, come to the server, you get mad lagging and other maddeningly things, and you've got all the unpredictable difficulties. :D joke

In this situation in RL, it is clearly described harmonization BCVM (computer which synchronizes frequency radar, with the head SARH).

Yes. But there are factors fusion rates also, and altitude. For different frequency, different values closer to prosecution. Generally yes, medium freq. for rear and medium is not good for natural or artificial interference. Why are some senses to make R-??T and EOS :) "High" is good for that "rear" also but the speed of convergence must be greater. Against attacker example... more then 230km/h max range 20km for altitude more than 3km. No chance against fighter.

RL radar switches to medium when you take "close mode". Like vertical or bore. In BVR mode, you have choice АВТ/ручно (automatic/manuel). Also, when is "medium", radar in RL can't track or lock target with speed more than 1100km/h in HOT and 2500km/h in COLD :) complex problems and if I have not yet talked about the radial speed and vetrical speed in "monitoring the passage" (like TWS) and shooting two targets with two R-27 on STT, and their condition for it. All you can to see what you mean to your device for radar separation target and they would see how we separated real target of chaff. :) Edit: I talk for MiG-29A-B/Su-27S-SK. For eagle I less know :( ... but I believe that it is better in all parameters.

In "High freq." mode, filter is good, and there is no confusion as long as two target (plane and chaff or other plane) are somewhat different from these three, altitude, speed and vector ranging within the 500m distance over 8 km in free space (serbian term for sky background), but calculation is slow in high aspect (180-160) so mistakes are great at switching from observing the track (lock). Often error of up to 8 km, and is often unsuccessful lock on and the correction of fixing the aerial and extended search on average 7-12s. that is problem with "high" freq. However, when the locking to give, after is all stably. But search and lock problem is within the range of 8 km, when it switches on "medium"freq. In "Medium" there are disturbing false targets (from chaff on the sky, or clutter or chaff on the look down), but due to better behavior on the rapid changes in information at short distances, combat modes for close combat is always used "medium" frequency, when the interference from the chaff as possible in "look up", and in a high aspect (180-160) with clutter in look down. In "inermedium" mode, because of frequent overshoot, if the target of turning defensive in "look up", at the moment of transition from Hot to Cold, lock it may break (does not mean always) if it lasts more than three cycles search by cramped cottage regime (I do not know what his name is an expression in English).

Nothing. I'm tired of all this and with the DCS stuff. See you in the spring, if something new. I turn to other things in my free time...

Of course :)

@GG I'm pretty convinced to sooner or later you'll find this information and see that something does a exist. And it is not manually, but automatically turns on. Russian pilots know clearly in his training, in close distance, today noch does not help!

No. The reason is that, the american planes used radar mode for small distance, whose characteristics it does not matter whether the bandit is to position 3-9, respectively not interpreter Doppler-pulse as in standard mode. This "frequency mode" is introduced as a supplement to the response to the Russian EOS in order to neutralize the ability hostile 3-9 maneuver. Two major disadvantages of this mode of operation are small range and large susceptibility to interference (ground efect, chaff). This possibility no Russian radars but have their EOS and IR as a supplement. Before 1997, eagles did not have such a possibility. Upgrade was created after analyzing ways to fight by Flanker. Such behavior in the "close mode radar" not simulated in DCS/flaming cliffs/lomac, never. sorry for english again :(

Not in anybody's interest to R-27 resembles the old SARH R-3. Not even eagles fans. While I kill S-300 with cannon with exploit (SARH bug = 50deg + chaff + slowly), eagles are killing each other because they have no opponents in the form flankers. I have no idea which is the interest that SARH be broken. My impression that programmers do not care for missiless during those months, but don't know for what kicked the logic from DCS 1.2. Definitely it was less wail...

Flanker forever!!! Little spam :D :thumbup:

... and trees/forest

only as a presentation of the possibilities for R-73

do you think it is easy with "S" and 300 km/h go to lead pursuit to Eagle for gun shoot when it moves relative fast (TRD about 500m) and distance from you (flanker) about 800m? This is the point of survival eagle. The issue of skills when and how to use the climbing to resolve the situation. In my opinion, in MP events, usually enough time to get outside help. The eagle has a chance against Flanker in WVR, but only in favorable starting conditions... P.S. Stuge is very very good guns fighter! :)

its it's probably a bug. override in at the moment as in the picture:

If you have a dual trigger on hotas like me, You can make a second step to be "launch permission override" with this my changes, to be switched off "override" when you let go of the button. First step is of course "fire". paste lua in Config/Input/Aircrafts * if launched R-73 in BVR mode within the "phase blinking", you can guess with 75deg. base_keyboard_binding.lua

with HELMET or BVR mode? [ame] [/ame]

I use "S" only when I want to increase the distance of the Eagle to over 1200m in "turn" fight, in order to reduce the speed with acquisition conditions for launch R-73 from more than 30deg. (can also to lead pursuit, and shoot). Increasing the distance is crucial for R-73.

its hard. limit for HELMET is 45deg, regardless of 75deg FOV for archer.

... or just climbing

its AI