Ragnarok

[ame] [/ame]

... and speed reduction.

How to make RES. OF COCKPIT DISPLAYS 256 every frame? Resolution great harm to my fps but microstutter it occurs if it is not "every frame"! Does anyone know how to edit 256 + every frame?

try to save coalition and then "new mission"... but yes, it is bug.

nothing

Rebels shot down a Russian rescue helicopter!!!

I think this is coincidence incident. Therefore, it would not surprise me for that tomorrow will be coincidence shoot-downed Turkish plane at Armenian-Turkish border. So it all begins... :(

It's all the same, no changes. SARH, ARH, IR. I await further...:music_whistling:

I must report to Putin and the Russian army may not use R-27, before it's too late! Omg they don't know that missiles are not working :shocking: :D Let them return to R-40 or R-3!

I think it's time to take a sailboat or cessna. Perfect solution. Stall speed 54 mph; 87km/h ,power off, flaps down. chaff chaff, fox 3, ragequit :D

Nah, if you like stall fight comedy xD Eagle stall fighter.rar

How is it possible auto lock outside the FOV to bridge? Bridge is a far from the place fixing!

I have experimented with what I have tacview file. Recorded experiment, I see that works, and I'm no longer used mode. For the rest behavior, I do not know. Changes in lua sending PM :thumbup:

Like me. 40/s :lol: For you of me. (Chaff logic - ZIP). But I prefer the official version, even if it was bad and illogical http://forums.eagle.ru/showthread.php?t=152429 example.rar

Nickname: Ragnarok Your profile at ED forum: http://forums.eagle.ru/member.php?u=93918 Chosen plane type: F-86F Sabre Country of residence: Serbia Time: GMT+1 Language of communication: Serbian Confirmation of familiarization with regulations of the tournament and the obligation to comply with them: Familiarized with regulations of this tournament, oblige myself to comply with them.

I did not see that ED plans to swear by currently in behavior. It will be good. No one wishes to convert the simulator in "chaff combat", or that chaff there is no function.

Dude, your radar illuminates both, and target and chaff. If is distance large, of course. This is not point illuminates. you understand? Look picture!

On "look up" condition, there must be rapidly progressive speed reduction, like hot aspect + chaff + 3-9 position, barrel roll (speed reduction). With large distance between attacker and bandit + small distance between SARH and bandit like on the picture, exist condition.

See the picture. If is target and chaff in fighters strobe and chaff only in field of view, SARH go to chaff. Four missiles have different angles field of view in relation to a real target. You're wrong. The question is, as a seeker of SARH gives priority chaff, especially if there is a secondary radio channel. What is important, is not a reflection from chaff, than dopler puls element. At the time of ejection, chaff always has the same direction (3-9 position like target), and lower Doppler effect because it lags in speed. What confuses me is bad encodedness in DCS when it comes to frequency ejection. If you throw 50 chaff per sec. it is better than 2-3 per sec. Vector between separate fixation points must exist. In reality, if you go chaff has consistently much, it can make the target even more visible. In DCS, spam with chaff pays off.

You want to say, if I do fire 4 missiles, you throw chaff, can not happen that the two go to the bait and two on target? Or all of the bait or all of the target?

Field of view is as crazy as in FC2. R77 too.

no

My old pattern of scan scheduling. Calculation of negative tangent. Someone may be helpful.

I make a tiny change - a small mod for JSGME, if someone wants to try I'll probably impact. To be clear, I do not think that if should be corrected a bug, or such values. I have not tested in all situations, but only in those situations that discriminate "look up - look down" behavior. Look my tacview and try my little changes mode. Do we want this kind of successful missile? Personally, I want only what is real, regardless of superiority or inferiority, but finally once we know what is real. example.rar

I'm sure this is just a passing bug. It will be corrected "look-up" factor, I'm convinced. Developers will not throw logic that are painstakingly built in their former versions. I expect improvement. I watch bugs in first openbeta 1.5, it was not chaff function, ever, in all sutuation. Nex fix, chaff is ON, but ARH not recognise chaff. Nex fix, ARH recognice chaff but all, ARH and SARH see chaff on look-up every time, every situation in 3-9 aspect or L/R ~ 140 with < 700km/h. NEX FIX WILL BE ALL RIGHT, I'm SHURE!!!