ESA_maligno

This morning I have been reading in an M3 entry where he talks about cabin mirrors and that it is weighing the request of some users who complain about how "complicated the management of the Corsair engine is" and that they are asking M3 to "simplify it". They have already thrown themselves into the pool putting the Water Master and now they are going to put the water injection that was introduced in 1946....; it seems to me a mistake..., but the bloody thing is that they are going to retouch the engine management model because people want to fly the Corsair to the Warthunder.... Is all this true?.

Thx for the fix M3

I've been disconnected from the MiG29 for a few days. From what I read ED did not present the MiG29 at the Expo, but gave a copy to Winwing for them to present their new hardware. Is it correct?

Versión 3.1 https://drive.google.com/file/d/1uWJlnGh8d5xGgw7gN655N7jMaGMy6jJr/view?usp=drivesdk

Pagan WWII airfield

Well, they have already communicated that there will be RSBN; now a list of radio navs aids would be good

RSBN!!!!!!; that’s great!!!!!!!

OK; i see…; Caucasus it’s the only accuracy map about navs aids jijijiji The l39 will not be able to use the na s aids of its own airfields; but an A10 of the enemy if....; how crazy; but everything is to please the children

What about Soviet nav aids ? East German bases with TACAN? ..... Is that true?

Well, what a serious failure....; although it was to be expected; unfortunately

Is it possible to have a list of the navigation aids that the map will have? Especially from the eastern part that are always the great forgotten

Tarres, no creo que sea “un deseo” que existan las radio ayudas del Pacto de Varsovia es más bien algo imprescindible y debiera ser obligatorio porque sino le faltaría algo básico al escenario. Coincido que no tiene sentido que lo hayan puesto en este foro

Coñe Cima, ¡cuánto tiempo!; pensábamos que te había pasado algo.

I believe that no DCSW module is supported by any weapons manufacturer, in fact none are involved in the development of DCSW. ED, via Wags, has said that the development of a module is based on it being requested by a large majority (sales and income potential), that it is not out of place in DCSW and that it is supported by open sources (no longer requires relying on "strict documentation"). That said, is it necessary to ask OAK for reliable data to make a module? Well, no, and I refer you to the first point that, by the way, ED makes it quite clear every time you launch the simulator...; I think the times of "the SVR comes and takes you on a flight without registration to Guantánamo..., sorry those are the others..., to Siberia" are behind us.