ESA_maligno

Coñe Cima, ¡cuánto tiempo!; pensábamos que te había pasado algo.

I believe that no DCSW module is supported by any weapons manufacturer, in fact none are involved in the development of DCSW. ED, via Wags, has said that the development of a module is based on it being requested by a large majority (sales and income potential), that it is not out of place in DCSW and that it is supported by open sources (no longer requires relying on "strict documentation"). That said, is it necessary to ask OAK for reliable data to make a module? Well, no, and I refer you to the first point that, by the way, ED makes it quite clear every time you launch the simulator...; I think the times of "the SVR comes and takes you on a flight without registration to Guantánamo..., sorry those are the others..., to Siberia" are behind us.

And it's taking off rwy 33 from Gudauta???..., entering the gorge upon reaching Cape Pitsunda

With the arrival of modules such as the F35, where the requirements of documentation and information sources are less demanding; I think a "dow of opportunity" opens for projects such as the modernized version of the MiG29; especially with the shortcomings that exist in DCSW if we compare the "blue side with the red side". Projects like VinntoreZ's would be a great starting point.

"There are many videos of how it flies and its systems...; you can talk to one of the pilots who lives in the US to describe them..." Jijijiji

It seems ridiculous that when they announced the A version of the MiG29, and the public requested an SMT version ED said that if it did not have "reliable data" they were not going to simulate an airplane...; now simply with a few marketing videos and other videos of a flying plane is enough....; because the public is going to pay...; the next will be Star Wars spacecraft

O7

Facebook and Instagram

Really looking forward to flying it

Same problem here, F4 tells me that it is not authorized

Some schemes for the MiG15 imitating the MOSCA and with the Falcó emblem; those with the red numeral are glossy and those with the yellow numeral are matte, I have also personalized one of them in the "Maestro" style of Soviet aviation:

I think we need this line or similar in the entry.lua....: mount_vfs_liveries_path(current_mod_path.."/Liveries")