Jump to content

Neon67

Members
  • Posts

    573
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Neon67

  1. to know for exemple how big the company is Is it groing up or dieing ? This would then gave us some infos then to know if dcs is going to die slowly or get new stuffs. Or continuous patch fixing bugs while creating new ones . You make it sounds like its a bad thing to be curious about the company develloping your best loved sim
  2. just to get some infos about ED actual situation
  3. is it a specific to Russia ? Cause in most country companies has to published it
  4. is there any published financial records from ED ? how many sales they made ? How many personal they have ? etc..
  5. Hi all I love the huey, however is there a way to fire rockets one by one, alternating from side right left, like for the A10 C ? I have a lot of trouble to set my sight right on the first pass,and i m using too much rockets before i can correct it. So if there is a way to spare some that would be great. Also the notice about range and elevation, it s all in miles and feet right ? BTW , Flares dispensers isn t implemented yet ?
  6. Neon67

    Tomahawk

    you have my thanks :)
  7. troll spoted ?
  8. Neon67

    Tomahawk

    is there also any data about how far can a ship use his main canon for arty support ? For the Tomahawk, through my tests it seems than a naval group will only fire one by fire tomahawk until impact, and not several in the same time to fill the attack point radius
  9. Neon67

    Tomahawk

    thanks does it works with multiple ships type ?
  10. Neon67

    Tomahawk

    Hi guys Anyone know how to get tomehawk fired from US ships ?
  11. thanks, does it belong to ed ?
  12. i'm afraid to ask :doh:, but what is TFC ?
  13. but the probabilty they have done it isn't aswell null :lol: But yes i'm just assuming and might be wrong, that is also why i posted this topic so we could get some answers :pilotfly:
  14. i said in most of my reply probably or i bet But now wasn't dcs a10-c for the army ? IF yes, why would the US army go to them ? perhaps because they made some others before ? edit my bad US Air force
  15. Don't expect to get details on paper, those kind of military contract won't ever be published. If you wanna train your pilot on a single seated combat helicopter , well then you really need a simulator ;) Almost every aircraft company do the same .
  16. but on the other hand , they released all (well almost) for the ka-50 as the production were cancelled . I bet ED was doing a simulator for the army then released it with approval from Moscow
  17. Chances are really high that ED did those, as they were always doing pro contracts, that gave birth to dcs a10c as the us army agreed to release it minus some stuff . I would have hoped it would have been the same for the ka-52 even if it has a lot of differents tech in it, but its still based on the ka-50 design, which is availlable. Engine must be almost the same, same kind of switch, combat avionics , ground and weather radar has been integrated, with night and day capabilities . And armement aswell , air to air, schturm . It sounds to me that the actual ka-52 is an evolution from the ka-50 protoype
  18. It went throught with the ka-50, yes still they were only prototypes, but it still a big part based to make the dual sit version
  19. Oh i wasnt aware of that, really sad to hear it :cry:
  20. http://englishrussia.com/2013/11/13/procedure-trainer-of-su-35-fighter/ and for the ka-52
  21. Dear ED I noticed that the russian military had a ka-52 and su-35 simulator running on FC /DCS engine, and i supposed you probably were involved in its developement. So i was wondering, and i'm probably not the only one, if those could be released to the public in a near futur like DCS A10C :joystick:, or not cause of military secrecy :cry: ? It would be great to get an official answer :thumbup: thanks
  22. is anyone working on simple insurgency vehicules like a 4x4 toyota mounted with a machine gun or zu23 ?
  23. Exellent mission , i played it severall times with friends and here are my notes :joystick: First is the c130 blowing up at the mission beginning, if its the first time you play it its quiete nice, but process should speed up between when it burns t ill runway clearance, we loose almost 10mn each time F18 pilot going down, the pilot parachute often few clics away while i am scanning the zone to get the other pilots location The patrol going to intercept the pilot, the two vehicules are easily destroyed , however you should change the trigger for the infantry, from group destroyed to group alive less than. Cause we had to make really accurate passes in order to kill every single infantry solders, which is really annoying. An other group of enemy vehicules, don t move at all, in a town near a lake, still around the pilots location When the rescue is done , where should the a10 land for rearm and refuel ? Hope it helps :smartass:
  24. From what i read in bvr fight, after firing go brake left right , and keep the lock at your radars cone limit til missile reaches it's target,try to be a little downer as your opponant so you can beam it. However it never really worked as my first missile never hit the plane, i don't fire it at max distance, rather 3/4. But still get easily confused and i get knocked out by aim120 in the mean time
  25. HI all sorry if i m not in the right thread I am trying to survive any engagement with the su27 against f16 f18 f15 in BVR combat I try to keep my target locked when using r27 et/er , but i have really a hard time evading aim 120 It seems my missile often miss while the americans counter part hit me without problem :cry:. So can someone explain me some basic tactic to improve my poor skills as a fighter to win air supremacy ? Thanks :joystick:
×
×
  • Create New...